Security Magazine logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Security Magazine logo
  • NEWS
    • Security Newswire
    • Technologies & Solutions
  • MANAGEMENT
    • Leadership Management
    • Enterprise Services
    • Security Education & Training
    • Logical Security
    • Security & Business Resilience
    • Profiles in Excellence
  • PHYSICAL
    • Access Management
    • Fire & Life Safety
    • Identity Management
    • Physical Security
    • Video Surveillance
    • Case Studies (Physical)
  • CYBER
    • Cybersecurity News
    • More
  • BLOG
  • COLUMNS
    • Cyber Tactics
    • Leadership & Management
    • Security Talk
    • Career Intelligence
    • Leader to Leader
    • Cybersecurity Education & Training
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Annual Guarding Report
    • Most Influential People in Security
    • The Security Benchmark Report
    • The Security Leadership Issue
    • Top Guard and Security Officer Companies
    • Top Cybersecurity Leaders
    • Women in Security
  • SECTORS
    • Arenas / Stadiums / Leagues / Entertainment
    • Banking/Finance/Insurance
    • Construction, Real Estate, Property Management
    • Education: K-12
    • Education: University
    • Government: Federal, State and Local
    • Hospitality & Casinos
    • Hospitals & Medical Centers
    • Infrastructure:Electric,Gas & Water
    • Ports: Sea, Land, & Air
    • Retail/Restaurants/Convenience
    • Transportation/Logistics/Supply Chain/Distribution/ Warehousing
  • EVENTS
    • Industry Events
    • Webinars
    • Solutions by Sector
    • Security 500 Conference
  • MEDIA
    • Videos
      • Cybersecurity & Geopolitical Discussion
      • Ask Me Anything (AMA) Series
    • Podcasts
    • Polls
    • Photo Galleries
  • MORE
    • Call for Entries
    • Classifieds & Job Listings
    • Continuing Education
    • Newsletter
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Store
    • White Papers
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • This Month's Content
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
PhysicalSecurity Leadership and ManagementSecurity Education & TrainingFire & Life SafetyPhysical SecurityHospitals & Medical Centers

The impact of coaching to reduce healthcare workplace violence

By Katarina R. Kemper, MSOL, CHPA
Doctor with patient
December 14, 2021

Healthcare employees are twenty times more likely to experience workplace violence (WPV) than any other profession. This statistic continues to rise in the United States. Healthcare providers experience patient violence due to various reasons such as altered mental status, agitation or fear. Violence is often predictable due to escalating verbal or paraverbal signs. Still, in some cases, it is not practical training that can reduce the significance of the injury. This piece will address three questions:

  • How does coaching and simulation training improve workforce behaviors and outcomes?
  • Are there typical coaching methods used in healthcare that are more effective?
  • Does the utilization of simulator training and team coaching have an impact on healthcare workplace violence?

This piece will introduce five articles that argue coaching and simulator training effectiveness. It reduces workplace violence prevention through hands-on training that provides the workforce with the knowledge, awareness, skills and confidence to manage situations. The first argument will prove that coaching and simulator training provide antecedent skills to prevent an event from escalating and react effectively should a situation escalate towards verbal or physical violence. The second argument supports simulation training followed by immediate coaching through debriefing and posits that it is effective in helping or modifying behaviors or techniques. Finally, the third argument utilizes research data to prove simulation and coaching improves workforce behaviors and outcomes.

Article 1

Eppich and Cheng initiated a three-year mixed-methods multi-step research process at three hospitals in Canada. The research aimed to justify the need for a standardized debriefing framework, development of the framework and simulation training on how to adapt the framework. The study resulted in the development of the “Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation” (PEARLS) coaching framework. The research identified a few practical guides and framework available; therefore, developing a new framework was necessary.

Article 2

W. J. Eppich et al. provides a narrative assessment of a qualitative study they conducted at several hospitals in Canada on the east coast of the United States. The article aimed to broaden the scope of and opportunities for additional debriefings as coaching conversations. The study found that participating in reoccurring simulation and coaching conversations contributes to healthier workplace culture.

Article 3

Martinez conducted a pilot simulation study of fifteen undergraduate nurses enrolled in a psychiatric class at a public university in a large, urban city in the U.S. The study aimed to enhance students’ knowledge about workplace violence; increase their confidence and ability to recognize signs of aggression; practice evidence-based interventions to de-escalate agitated patients; and evaluate the simulation.

Article 4

Robson et al. assessed 22 Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) program literature research papers. The research studied simulation training benefits and effectiveness regarding staff’s knowledge, attitude, beliefs and behaviors. The studies were conducted in different occupations and bundled together, impacting data specific to one industry.

Article 5

Wong et al. conducted a study of 162 Emergency Department staff members consisting of medical residents, nurses and police officers in a New York trauma hospital. The research was conducted over three months and aimed to develop a multi-disciplinary training program and assess attitudes pre- and post-didactic training and simulation. The study utilized the Management of Aggression and Violence Attitude Scale (MAVAS) tool.

In the above five articles, simulator training was typically referenced as a realistic but safe venue to act out situations to address issues. Additionally, the articles utilized the word “coach” or “coaching” as one’s observations and perspectives on specific matters; it may involve confirming or challenging learners’ self-assessment of their performance by providing effective feedback and focused teaching. To better understand simulator training and coaching effectiveness, I focused on: 

  1. the impact of simulation training and coaching
  2. practical methods 
  3. results and impact on the participants

Simulation training and coaching impact 

Simulation training is a highly utilized method in healthcare to provide skills-based, hands-on training in a team approach. It provides close to real-life experiences in a safe environment, allowing participants to play out scenarios as they would in reality. Robson reported that simulator training positively affects staff regarding knowledge, attitudes and behaviors. More engaging (hands-on) workplace violence (WPV) training had a higher impact than less engaging (classroom) training. Martinez’s pre- and post-surveys after a WPV simulation training also showed a statistically significant confidence level that simulations increase participants’ knowledge, skills and confidence.

Coaching during and after simulation events provides participants the opportunity to reflect on their performance and opportunities for improvement. Typically, a debrief is conducted at the end of the simulation, asking open-ended questions regarding how participants felt about their performance and areas for improvement. Eppich utilized a standardized, four-step debrief model: obtain a reaction, describe the event, analyze opportunities and summarize the discussion. Healthcare coaches have also conducted “micro-briefings” in the middle of simulations to provide immediate coaching allowing participants to review the process. Standardization of debriefs and coaching response has also shown positive impacts on training.

Simulation-coaching methods 

These articles addressed limited resources, tools and a standardized framework surrounding WPV simulations and coaching. The studies also addressed limitations of experience and knowledge of coaches themselves. During a multi-year study, Eppich and Cheng developed a coaching tool called Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS).  The PEARLS framework consists of a standardized coaching script followed by questions.  Regardless of the coach’s experience or skills, this standardized framework is thriving. The coach can select questions based on gaps addressing knowledge, skills or behaviors. Eppich and Wong support simulation training, aligned with a pragmatic coach to experiment with different responses to have the most significant impact.

Standardized simulator training and use of a standardized debriefing tool by a coach have shown improvement to prepare healthcare workers against workplace violence, their responses and confidence levels. Martinez utilized the Mental Health Nursing Clinical Confidence Scale (MHNCCS) to measure impact. Wong et al. measured training impact using the Management of Aggression and Violence Attitude Scale (MAVAS). Some can argue that because clinicians are prepared and confident, they can handle the event, which will reduce events from occurring as they identify escalation behaviors and can react before it turns to violence. In essence, they can differentiate the “how” and “why” of a WPV event and mitigate the situation earlier.

Unfortunately, the articles did not prove that the simulations and coaching mitigated future violent events. However, simulation and team coaching have proven successful in addressing staff knowledge, skills, behaviors and confidence.

This article originally ran in Security, a twice-monthly security-focused eNewsletter for security end users, brought to you by Security Magazine. Subscribe here.

KEYWORDS: healthcare workers hospital security security education security training study workplace violence workplace violence prevention

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Headshots 8 18 2016 0077

Katarina Kemper is Founder, Principal Consultant, and CEO of Healthcare Public Safety and Security Consultants, LLC. Previously, she was Director of Physical Security for HCA Healthcare. Kemper has more than 24 years of experience in healthcare quality, risk, safety, security and emergency preparedness and has have previously worked as a state investigator. Kemper has a Bachelor’s degree in criminal justice from Chaminade University and a Master’s degree in organizational leadership from Colorado State University.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
To unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • Security's Top Cybersecurity Leaders 2024

    Security's Top Cybersecurity Leaders 2024

    Security magazine's Top Cybersecurity Leaders 2024 award...
    Security Leadership and Management
    By: Security Staff
  • cyber brain

    The intersection of cybersecurity and artificial intelligence

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is a valuable cybersecurity...
    Logical Security
    By: Pam Nigro
  • artificial intelligence AI graphic

    Assessing the pros and cons of AI for cybersecurity

    Artificial intelligence (AI) has significant implications...
    Logical Security
    By: Charles Denyer
Subscribe For Free!
  • Security eNewsletter & Other eNews Alerts
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Online Registration
  • Mobile App
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Security audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Security or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Crisis Response Team
    Sponsored byEverbridge

    Automate or Fall Behind – Crisis Response at the Speed of Risk

  • Perimeter security
    Sponsored byAMAROK

    Why Property Security is the New Competitive Advantage

  • Duty of Care
    Sponsored byAMAROK

    Integrating Technology and Physical Security to Advance Duty of Care

Popular Stories

Pills spilled

More than 20,000 sensitive medical records exposed

Laptop in darkness

Verizon 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report shows rise in cyberattacks

Coding on screen

Research reveals mass scanning and exploitation campaigns

White post office truck

Department of Labor Sues USPS Over Texas Whistleblower Termination

Computer with binary code hovering nearby

Cyberattacks Targeting US Increased by 136%

2025 Security Benchmark banner

Events

September 29, 2025

Global Security Exchange (GSX)

 

November 17, 2025

SECURITY 500 Conference

This event is designed to provide security executives, government officials and leaders of industry with vital information on how to elevate their programs while allowing attendees to share their strategies and solutions with other security industry executives.

View All Submit An Event

Products

Security Culture: A How-to Guide for Improving Security Culture and Dealing with People Risk in Your Organisation

Security Culture: A How-to Guide for Improving Security Culture and Dealing with People Risk in Your Organisation

See More Products

Related Articles

  • Nurse puts on gloves

    Investigating violence prevention and healthcare workplace violence programs

    See More
  • nurses-doctors-free-1170.jpg

    Healthcare leadership and employees have different perspectives on workplace violence programs

    See More
  • healthcare-freepik1170x658v689.jpg

    Increased healthcare security risks due to Roe v Wade reversal

    See More

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • February 20, 2025

    Ideological Tensions in the Workplace: Understanding and Mitigating Risks of Violence

    ON DEMAND: Organizations face evolving threats, including workplace violence stemming from ideological tensions, political polarization, economic disparities, and other factors.
View AllSubmit An Event
×

Sign-up to receive top management & result-driven techniques in the industry.

Join over 20,000+ industry leaders who receive our premium content.

SIGN UP TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing