Security Magazine logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Security Magazine logo
  • NEWS
    • Security Newswire
    • Technologies & Solutions
  • MANAGEMENT
    • Leadership Management
    • Enterprise Services
    • Security Education & Training
    • Logical Security
    • Security & Business Resilience
    • Profiles in Excellence
  • PHYSICAL
    • Access Management
    • Fire & Life Safety
    • Identity Management
    • Physical Security
    • Video Surveillance
    • Case Studies (Physical)
  • CYBER
    • Cybersecurity News
    • More
  • BLOG
  • COLUMNS
    • Cyber Tactics
    • Leadership & Management
    • Security Talk
    • Career Intelligence
    • Leader to Leader
    • Cybersecurity Education & Training
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Annual Guarding Report
    • Most Influential People in Security
    • The Security Benchmark Report
    • The Security Leadership Issue
    • Top Guard and Security Officer Companies
    • Top Cybersecurity Leaders
    • Women in Security
  • SECTORS
    • Arenas / Stadiums / Leagues / Entertainment
    • Banking/Finance/Insurance
    • Construction, Real Estate, Property Management
    • Education: K-12
    • Education: University
    • Government: Federal, State and Local
    • Hospitality & Casinos
    • Hospitals & Medical Centers
    • Infrastructure:Electric,Gas & Water
    • Ports: Sea, Land, & Air
    • Retail/Restaurants/Convenience
    • Transportation/Logistics/Supply Chain/Distribution/ Warehousing
  • EVENTS
    • Industry Events
    • Webinars
    • Solutions by Sector
    • Security 500 Conference
  • MEDIA
    • Videos
      • Cybersecurity & Geopolitical Discussion
      • Ask Me Anything (AMA) Series
    • Podcasts
    • Polls
    • Photo Galleries
  • MORE
    • Call for Entries
    • Classifieds & Job Listings
    • Continuing Education
    • Newsletter
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Store
    • White Papers
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • This Month's Content
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!
Security NewswireTop Guard and Security Officer CompaniesSecurity Leadership and ManagementSecurity Education & Training

Was the Capital Gazette Shooting a Reminder of Security Responsibility?

By A. Benjamin Mannes
police1-900px.jpg
July 3, 2018

On June 28, 2018 at 2:40PM eastern time, shots rang out at the offices of the Capital Gazette; a local newspaper covering Annapolis, Maryland.  The shooting resulted in the deaths of five people and injuries to two others who worked at the paper who were reportedly shot by a suspect identified as Jarrod Ramos of Laurel, Maryland. Predictably, the shooting triggered a media firestorm speculating numerous possible political motives for the shooting, as well as rumors that Ramos mutilated his fingertips to avoid identification and the possibility that it was a coordinated attack on the media,  resulting in preventative sweeps of newsrooms in Baltimore, New York and Washington.

After the dust settled, the Capital Gazette shooting ended up being yet another horrific case of workplace violence, resulting from a long-term feud that Ramos had with the paper. Ramos, triggered by losing a defamation claim against the Capital Gazette over their coverage of a domestic harassment case against him, carried out the shooting as an act of revenge. While Ramos is being uncooperative with law enforcement, the many reports of his fingerprints being mutilated have been debunked, as well as any political motivations and possible coordination with other attackers. Reportedly, Ramos used an unmodified shotgun in the attack, and while reports emerged of his having smoke grenades, none of the victims recalled him using any.   

So given the absence of the usual media sensationalism and shift to wedge issues experienced after an active shooting, America could use this attack as an opportunity to examine an employer’s responsibility relative to the safety and security of their staff and visitors.

On a positive note, the Capital Gazette shooting showed that, on a public level, public agencies that train effectively for these types of incidents can respond quick enough to save lives. The shooting prompted a combined response by both Anne Arundel County and Annapolis City Police, with officers arriving in just one minute from the first calls for service. Ramos was caught on scene with the weapon without shots fired, nor any officers injured. Employees were then evacuated from the building with hands raised above their heads, with subsequent sweeps for additional attackers and possible devices by police. The Capital Gazette, while grieving the loss of five of their colleagues, was not deterred by this cowardly act of violence and put Friday’s paper out on time.

So what can we learn from this attack? Like all others, this shooting could have possibly been prevented, if not mitigated, by the adoption of basic corporate security best practices on the part of the Capital Gazette or its parent company; the Baltimore Sun. The Capital Gazette’s offices were in a mixed-use office building, which is common in many American workplaces. In my threat assessment experience, most businesses who rent space in mixed use buildings take no further responsibility for security measures in their workplaces than what measures are offered by property managers.

When speaking with corporate leaders, many I interact with have a narrow view of corporate security as someone with grey pants and a blue blazer greeting people in the lobby, or recently more as a data security professional. However, an effective approach to corporate security includes the appointment of an enterprise-level executive who understands the physical, cyber and investigative threat profile faced by their organization.

At issue with the threat of workplace violence is the question over who has the responsibility to detect threats and secure the workplace effectively. Normally, public and media scrutiny after an attack gets directed toward law enforcement response and/or those close to the attacker. The Capital Gazette attack, however, shows a long history of vitriol, litigation and threatening communications from Ramos, which resulted in no increases in security, restraining orders or reports to law enforcement. 

This need for threat detection is highlighted in a June, 2018 FBI report that studied the 63 active shooters from 2000-2013, including the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooter, in which four or more people were killed indiscriminately. The report states: “What emerges is a complex and troubling picture of individuals who fail to successfully navigate multiple stressors in their lives while concurrently displaying four to five observable, concerning behaviors, engaging in planning and preparation, and frequently communicating threats or leaking indications of an intent to attack.” The study also said: “In the weeks and months before an attack, many active shooters engage in behaviors that may signal impending violence”.

This illustrates a clear gap in the private, routine detection of potential security threats. While the common layman’s perspective is that it’s the government’s responsibility to identify and stop these threats, there needs to be a systematic method for detecting and reporting these behaviors before an attack. In a free society, there is no “big brother” that is culling through millions of social media posts and private communications to identify those that signal a potential threat. Workplaces of all kinds need to have people in responsible charge of security who lead both physical and investigative elements to act on threats identified by employees. The FBI report clearly states, “While some of these behaviors are intentionally concealed, others are observable and — if recognized and reported — may lead to a disruption prior to an attack.” If security industry best practices are applied to threats leading up to attacks, steps would have been taken at places like the Capital Gazette and Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School that possibly would have prevented the senseless loss of lives.

In this day in age, employers can no longer subscribe to the irresponsible “it can’t happen here” approach to workplace violence threats. On the safety side, we have business continuity plans and drills for fires and natural disasters that may never happen, but we still plan for them on a routine basis. While we all hope that it will never happen to us, the standard-of-care in workplace safety and security has changed with the rise of active shooter incidents. Therefore, employers need to seriously consider the cost of inaction in weighing the pros and cons of upgrading your corporate security posture.

KEYWORDS: active shooter workplace violence

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Press photo

A. Benjamin Mannes, MA, CPP is a decorated former municipal and federal law enforcement officer and criminal justice reform advocate. He has served as a consultant and expert witness in security and safety and was the Director, Office of Investigations for the American Board of Internal Medicine from 2008-2017. Mannes is a public safety contributor to Philadelphia Weekly, Broad + Liberty and other publications and he currently serves on the Public Safety Advisory Board for Pennsylvania Gubernatorial candidate Lou Barletta.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
To unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • Security's Top Cybersecurity Leaders 2024

    Security's Top Cybersecurity Leaders 2024

    Security magazine's Top Cybersecurity Leaders 2024 award...
    Security Enterprise Services
    By: Security Staff
  • cyber brain

    The intersection of cybersecurity and artificial intelligence

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is a valuable cybersecurity...
    Cybersecurity
    By: Pam Nigro
  • artificial intelligence AI graphic

    Assessing the pros and cons of AI for cybersecurity

    Artificial intelligence (AI) has significant implications...
    Cybersecurity Education & Training
    By: Charles Denyer
Manage My Account
  • Security eNewsletter & Other eNews Alerts
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Online Registration
  • Mobile App
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Security audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Security or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Crisis Response Team
    Sponsored byEverbridge

    Automate or Fall Behind – Crisis Response at the Speed of Risk

  • Perimeter security
    Sponsored byAMAROK

    Why Property Security is the New Competitive Advantage

  • Duty of Care
    Sponsored byAMAROK

    Integrating Technology and Physical Security to Advance Duty of Care

Popular Stories

Coding

AI Emerges as the Top Concern for Security Leaders

Half open laptop

“Luigi Was Right”: A Look at the Website Sharing Data on More Than 1,000 Executives

Shopping mall

Victoria’s Secret Security Incident Shuts Down Website

Laptop with coding on ground

Stepping Into the Light: Why CISOs Are Replacing Black-Box Security With Open-Source XDR

Gift cards and credit cards

Why Are Cyberattacks Targeting Retail? Experts Share Their Thoughts

2025 Security Benchmark banner

Events

June 24, 2025

Inside a Modern GSOC: How Anthropic Benchmarks Risk Detection Tools for Speed and Accuracy

For today's security teams, making informed decisions in the first moments of a crisis is critical.

July 17, 2025

Tech in the Jungle: Leveraging Surveillance, Access Control, and Technology in Unique Environments

From animal habitats to bustling crowds of visitors, a zoo is a one-of-a-kind environment for deploying modern security technologies.

View All Submit An Event

Products

Security Culture: A How-to Guide for Improving Security Culture and Dealing with People Risk in Your Organisation

Security Culture: A How-to Guide for Improving Security Culture and Dealing with People Risk in Your Organisation

See More Products

Related Articles

  • Astroworld festival in Houston Texas

    Astroworld deaths serve as solemn duty of care reminder

    See More
  • Education - Security Magazine

    The Risks of Oversimplifying the School Security Issue

    See More
  • church

    Attacks on Religious Targets: Another Example of a Need for Vigilance

    See More

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • August 27, 2025

    Risk Mitigation as a Competitive Edge

    In today’s volatile environment, a robust risk management strategy isn’t just a requirement—it’s a foundation for organizational resilience. From cyber threats to climate disruptions, the ability to anticipate, withstand, and adapt to disruption is becoming a hallmark of industry leaders.
  • July 17, 2025

    Tech in the Jungle: Leveraging Surveillance, Access Control, and Technology in Unique Environments

    From animal habitats to bustling crowds of visitors, a zoo is a one-of-a-kind environment for deploying modern security technologies.
View AllSubmit An Event
×

Sign-up to receive top management & result-driven techniques in the industry.

Join over 20,000+ industry leaders who receive our premium content.

SIGN UP TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing