Charlie Kirk, a 31-year-old conservative activist and commentator, was shot and killed Wednesday, Sept. 10 at Utah Valley University (UVU). The commentator was there for a campus event, hosted in the UVU courtyard. Kirk was shot at approximately 12:20 p.m. MT and was transferred to a vehicle. His passing was announced by President Trump at 2:40 p.m. MT via a Truth Social post. 

Gaps in Event Security 

The Associated Press interviewed security experts and found the event security to be inadequate; however, the article also acknowledged the limitations faced by the local law enforcement and security staff, such as insufficient staffing. While Kirk’s security was protecting the inner circle closest to him, the middle and outer circles remained insecure. Much like last year’s attempted assassination of President Trump, the shooter took advantage of a rooftop to open fire. The gunman fired from a distance of approximately 200 yards. 

Yet, this security is reportedly consistent with many other event security situations. For many in the industry, this is a sign that event security is struggling to keep pace with the range of modern threats. 

“This is a police chief’s nightmare,” said Jeff Long, the campus police chief who coordinated with Kirk’s security team. “You try to get your bases covered, and unfortunately today we didn’t, and because of that we had this tragic incident.”

The Increasing Threat of Political Violence 

As of Sept. 12, authorities have captured the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, after a family member of the suspect got in contact with law enforcement. Utah Governor Spencer Cox affirmed the suspect’s identity and suggested that the suspect had become “more political” as of late. According to CBS news, the suspect’s latest voter registration date was on July 13, 2021, and there was no declared political party listed. 

“Investigators interviewed a family member of Robinson who stated that Robinson had become more political in recent years,” Cox stated. “The family member referenced a recent incident in which Robinson came to dinner prior to September 10. And in the conversation with another family member, Robinson mentioned Charlie Kirk was coming to UVU.”

The shooting of a prominent political voice has raised concerns about the increase in political violence in the United States. Earlier this year, House Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman (DFL-Brooklyn Park) and her husband were fatally shot in their home. Additionally, Senator John Hoffman (DFL-Champlin) and his wife were shot a total of 17 times in a related attack, but survived. These acts of violence were committed by Vance Luther Boelter, who intended to “inflict fear and violence upon Minnesota elected officials and their families” and “equipped himself with firearms and body armor, [disguising] himself as a law enforcement officer” in order to carry out the attack. 

“According to the charges, the defendant had a list of possible targets and went to the homes of public officials to conduct violent attacks,” FBI Director Kash Patel stated in a press release for the U.S. Department of Justice. “This type of violence is unacceptable, and the FBI stands united with our law enforcement partners to find and hold accountable anyone who commits such despicable acts.”

According to experts, such examples of political violence are only part of a concerning, growing trend. Researcher Mike Jensen at the University of Maryland states, “This event is horrifying, alarming, but not necessarily surprising.”

Within the first six months of 2025, the U.S. experienced approximately 150 politically-driven attacks; this is almost double of what was faced last year in the same period. 

“I think we are in a very, very dangerous spot right now that could quite easily escalate into more widespread civil unrest if we don’t get a hold of it,” Jensen remarks. “This could absolutely serve as a kind of flashpoint that inspires more of it.”

Research fellow Jon Lewis with the Program on Extremism at George Washington University says, “Extreme political violence is increasingly becoming the norm in our country, and the shooting of Charlie Kirk is indicative of a far greater and more pervasive issue: acts of violence are becoming more common, even without any clear ideology or motive.”