How DHS intelligence strategy has changed since January 6

In a recent congressional hearing, Head of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Intelligence and Analysis John Cohen detailed how the DHS has shifted its intelligence strategy since the January 6 riots that breached the U.S. Capitol building. The House Intelligence Committee received testimony from Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and DHS officials on the topic of domestic terrorism.

The current threat landscape is "one of the most complex, volatile and dynamic that I've experienced in my career," said Cohen. Disinformation, violent crime and international and domestic terrorism are some of the important risk factors for security professionals to consider highlighted by Cohen in his address. According to Cohen, "the primary terrorism facing the U.S. comes from lone offenders and small groups of individuals who are motivated by extremist ideologies."

In response to a question from Indiana Rep. Andre Carson, Cohen detailed the specific changes made by DHS since the events of January 6, 2021, which included:

Redoubled efforts to coordinate intelligence sharing between federal, state, local and private organizations
Increased analysis of online activity and the evaluation of activity for potential risks of violence
Incorporation of threat-related intelligence into operational planning

Cohen pointed to the example of Inauguration Day, which took place just two weeks after the Capitol building was breached by rioters. He noted that organizers and participants in the January 6 riots did not view them as an end goal, but rather a starting point, and that people involved in the breach continued to express violent intentions online. In order to prevent more violence, the DHS increased physical security measures around the Capitol building on Inauguration Day, ensured the high visibility of national guard and law enforcement and instituted a public security presence both in Washington D.C. and state capitols around the country.

Cohen spoke to prevention tools employed by the U.S. over the past two decades, citing the effectiveness of joint terrorism task forces (JTTs). However, he said that JTTs alone are no longer enough to deal with the domestic threats facing the country today. Local, community-based prevention can help reach potentially escalated individuals before their actions reach a threat level necessitating a terrorism investigation. DHS has increased funding directed into communities in order to mitigate the risk of violence from the onset.

Madeline Lauver joined Security magazine in 2021 as its Assistant Editor. She covers news affecting enterprise security leaders, including physical security, cybersecurity, leadership and management, risk and resilience and more. Within her role at Security, Lauver focuses on news articles, Web Exclusives, features, and several departments for Security’s monthly digital edition, as well as managing social media and multimedia content. Lauver graduated in 2019 with a BA in English, German and Media Studies from Kalamazoo College.

Situational awareness should be at the forefront of your security program. It can mean the difference between life and death in a workplace emergency.

Security’s digital transformation is now entering stage 5. Complex security technologies are connected to HR systems, global security operations centers, and other building technologies in a world where employees now work in two places: home and the corporate office.