This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Security Magazine logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Security Magazine logo
  • Home
  • News
    • Security Newswire
    • Technologies
    • Security Blog
    • Newsletter
    • Web Exclusives
  • Columns
    • Career Intelligence
    • Security Talk
    • The Corner Office
    • Leadership & Management
    • Cyber Tactics
    • Overseas and Secure
    • The Risk Matrix
  • Management
    • Leadership Management
    • Enterprise Services
    • Security Education & Training
    • More
  • Physical
    • Access Management
    • Video Surveillance
    • Identity Management
    • More
  • Cyber
  • Sectors
    • Education: University
    • Hospitals & Medical Centers
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • More
  • Exclusives
    • Security 500 Report
    • Most Influential People in Security
    • Top Guard and Security Officer Companies
    • The Security Leadership Issue
    • Annual Innovations, Technology, & Services Report
  • Events
    • Industry Events
    • Webinars
    • Solutions by Sector
    • Security 500 Conference
    • Security 500 West
  • Resources
    • The Magazine
      • This Month's Issue
      • Digital Edition
      • Archives
      • Professional Security Canada
    • Videos
      • ISC West 2019
    • Photo Galleries
    • Polls
    • Classifieds & Job Listings
    • White Papers
    • Mobile App
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Continuing Education
  • InfoCenters
    • Building AppSec in Enterprises
  • Contact
    • Editorial Guidelines
  • Advertise
Home » The FTC-Facebook Settlement: A Major Shift in U.S. Privacy Regulation
Security Leadership and ManagementManagementCyberSecurity Education & TrainingSectorsGovernment: Federal, State and LocalColumns
Education & Training

The FTC-Facebook Settlement: A Major Shift in U.S. Privacy Regulation

SEC1119-edu-Feat-slide1_900px
SEC1119-edu-slide2_900px
SEC1119-edu-Feat-slide1_900px
SEC1119-edu-slide2_900px
November 8, 2019
Mindi Giftos and Ephraim Hintz
KEYWORDS Facebook security / GDPR / personally identifiable information / privacy concerns
Reprints
No Comments

In 2010, Mark Zuckerberg famously stated that privacy was no longer a “social norm.” Today, the Facebook founder is no doubt viewing social norms around privacy a bit differently, as are U.S. regulators and consumers.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently confirmed that it agreed to a settlement with Facebook, stemming from the social media giant’s alleged privacy violations in the Cambridge Analytica scandal. In the settlement order, Facebook agreed to pay a record-breaking $5 billion penalty to resolve the FTC’s claims that Facebook violated a prior FTC order by repeatedly using deceptive disclosures and settings to undermine users’ privacy preferences and allowing Facebook to share users’ personal information without prior consent with third party applications.

 

Is The Fine Enough?

Some argue that the $5 billion fine is not significant enough, given Facebook’s revenue and value. However, the fine is unprecedented and objectively large by every measure. It is not only the largest penalty ever imposed on a company for violating consumers’ privacy rights, it is twenty times greater than the next largest privacy or data security penalty ever imposed on a company. And, given that Facebook had $56 billion in total revenue last year; the fine comprises nine to 10 percent of Facebook’s global revenue, which is more than double the recoverable amount possible under the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This is a massive fine, and it should be a wake-up call to any company that is not complying with a previous FTC order or is playing fast and loose with consumer data.

 

Privacy Restrictions

Unsurprisingly, the order also requires Facebook to implement more stringent privacy practices and procedures, including:

  1. Not misrepresent to its users what information Facebook is collecting, the information Facebook makes available to third parties and the steps a user has to take to verify the privacy of the user’s Facebook account.
  2. Disclose a privacy rights statement to its users and obtain affirmative express consent from its users prior to sharing or disclosing a user’s personal information with a third party.
  3. Delete a user’s personal information after a reasonable period of time, no longer than 30 days, from the time the user deletes the information from his or her account OR deactivates his or her account.
  4. Provide clear and conspicuous notice of its use of facial recognition technology, and obtain affirmative express consent prior to any use.
  5. Not disclose a user’s telephone number, without prior affirmative express consent, for the purpose of advertising in which the user disclosed his or her phone number for the specific purpose of adding security to his or her Facebook account.
  6. Obtain initial and biennial assessments of its privacy program from an independent third party professional.

 

Never Before Seen Governance Requirements

In addition to the massive fine, the even more groundbreaking provisions of the order are sweeping new privacy governance restrictions. These restrictions are designed to radically overhaul the way Facebook manages its privacy program, and to implement external oversight of Facebook’s privacy program. Unlike any other FTC order concerning data privacy, this order aims to create greater accountability at Facebook’s Board of Directors’ level.

Within 120 days of entry of the order, Facebook must create an independent privacy committee and adopt a committee charter. The privacy committee must only consist of independent members from Facebook’s Board of Directors, meaning that none of Facebook’s executives may serve on the committee. Further, an independent nominating committee will select the privacy committee’s members. The privacy committee will have oversight responsibilities for Facebook’s privacy program and will need to work in conjunction with an independent assessor, who will evaluate the effectiveness of Facebook’s privacy program through fact gathering and testing. The independent assessor must be a third party, not associated with Facebook.

Once established Facebook’s charter for its privacy committee must include the following qualifications and responsibilities:

  1. Hold at least four meetings each year.
  2. All members of the privacy committee must be independent directors.
  3. Have four briefings a year with Facebook’s Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg concerning the state of Facebook’s privacy program, Facebook’s compliance with the order and Facebook’s material risks with privacy and confidentiality.
  4. Review independent assessor reports concerning Facebook’s privacy program.
  5. Once a year, the privacy committee must review Facebook’s privacy program and assess Facebook’s plans and procedures to mitigate privacy risks.
  6. Meet with an independent third-party assessor on a quarterly basis.

The order authorizes the FTC to use the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure’s discovery tools to monitor Facebook’s compliance with the order.

 

Personal Liability for CEO Mark Zuckerberg

The order also imposes accountability at the individual level. As CEO, Mark Zuckerberg now will have personal liability for any false certifications made to the FTC, independent assessor, or the privacy committee. Personal liability also extends to any compliance officer or director for false certifications made to the FTC.

 

Takeaways

While the U.S. does not yet have a federal comprehensive data privacy regulatory framework, the FTC is sending a clear message that its involvement in privacy enforcement actions will have teeth, particularly after their prior orders have been violated. The Facebook settlement includes governance requirements and imposes a penalty that far exceed the requirements and potential penalties possible under the GDPR, which are widely thought to be substantial.

All companies – including U.S. companies who may have previously believed privacy regulations were not as strict in the U.S. – should review their privacy practices and procedures to not only ensure they are operating in a reasonable manner, but to also catch up to the rapidly evolving data privacy and security landscape.

Subscribe to Security Magazine

Giftos-mindi

Mindi Giftos is a partner with Husch Blackwell LLP. She is a co-leader of the firm’s Internet of Things (IoT) and Data Privacy, Cybersecurity & Breach Response teams and is the office managing partner of the firm’s Madison, Wis. office.

Ephraim Hintz is an associate in Husch Blackwell LLP’s Denver’s office, who assists clients on emerging data privacy issues.

Related Articles

A Seismic Shift: What California’s New Privacy Law Means for Cybersecurity

TRUST - the Five Essential Rules of Consumer Privacy in the Age of Face Recognition

Related Events

A4M 27th Annual World Congress

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • Security eNewsletter & Other eNews Alerts
  • Online Registration
  • Mobile App
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Popular Stories

cybersecurity breach

The Top 12 Data Breaches of 2019

Mark Hargraves

Security Industry Mourns Passing of Mark Hargraves

ransomware-enews

British American Tobacco Suffers Data Breach and Ransomware Attack

Dispelling the Dangerous Myth of Data Breach Fatigue; cyber security news

Major Retailer Macy's Is Hacked

SEC1219-Cover-Feat-slide1_900px

Contracted vs. In-House Guarding: No Universal Right Answer

360x184customcontent_1.23Everbridge

Events

December 17, 2019

Conducting a Workplace Violence Threat Analysis and Developing a Response Plan

There are few situations a security professional will face that is more serious than a potential workplace violence threat. Every security professional knows and understands that all employers have a legal, ethical and moral duty to take reasonable steps to prevent and respond to threats of violence in their workplace.
January 23, 2020

The Value of a Unified Approach to Critical Event Management

From extreme weather to cyberattacks to workplace violence, every organization will experience at least one, if not multiple, critical events per year. And in today’s interconnected digital and physical world, the cascading safety, brand, and revenue impacts of critical events are more severe. Organizations need to be prepared through a unified and rapid response to these events.
View All Submit An Event

Poll

Emergency Communications

What does your enterprise use to communicate emergencies to company employees?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Effective Security Management, 6th Edition

Effective Security Management, 6th Edition

 Effective Security Management, 5e, teaches practicing security professionals how to build their careers by mastering the fundamentals of good management. Charles Sennewald brings a time-tested blend of common sense, wisdom, and humor to this bestselling introduction to workplace dynamics. 

See More Products
SEC500_250x180 clear

Security Magazine

SEC-December-2019-Cover_144px

2019 December

This month, Security magazine brings you the 2019 Guarding Report, featuring David Komendat, Boeing CSO, and many other public safety leaders to discuss threats and solutions for 2020 and security officer training. Also, we highlight Hector Rodriguez, Director of Public Safety and Security at Marymount California University, CCPA regulations, NIST standards, VMS and much more.

View More Create Account
  • More
    • Market Research
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • Security Group
    • Editorial Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Survey And Sample
  • Want More
    • Subscribe
    • Connect
    • Partners

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing