Study says 75% of U.S. Organizations are not Prepared to Respond to Cyber Attacks

A new study from Ponemon Institute says that 75 percent of U.S. organizations are not prepared to respond to cyberattacks.

The Cyber Resilient Organization: Learning to Thrive Against Threats, from Ponemon Institute, benchmarks U.S. organizations’ Cyber Resilience and gives them ways to improve and measure their Cyber Resilience over time.

The report – authored by Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute with founding sponsor Resilient Systems – surveyed more than 600 IT and security executives about their organizations’ approaches to becoming more resilient in the face of increasingly problematic and frequent cyberattacks. The respondents comprised a wide range of senior security professionals across several verticals, including financial services, healthcare, government, technology, and manufacturing.

Fndings from the study include:

• Attaining Cyber Resilience is critical to achieving business goals
o Ninety-one percent said Cyber Resilience is essential to protecting intellectual property, while 90 percent said it is required for minimizing non-compliance with regulations and obligations

• However, the current state of Cyber Resilience for these organizations needs immediate improvement
o Only 25 percent believe that their organization is truly cyber resilient
o Only 32 percent feel that they can properly recover from a cyberattack
o The vast majority also believe that they lack the proper tools and infrastructure to prevent attacks in the first place

• The majority of organizations are not prepared to respond to the next wave of cyberattacks and threats
o Only 30 percent of respondents have a proper, modern Cyber Security Incident Response Plan (CSIRP) in place
o Only 17 percent have a well-defined CSIRP that is applied consistently across their organization

• Human error is the enemy of Cyber Resilience
o Revealed to be the top culprit in preventing organizations from achieving Cyber Resilience

• Lack of collaboration across business functions makes organizations more vulnerable to cyberattacks
o One-third (32 percent) of respondents stated that collaboration between business functions was poor or non-existent, and had a direct negative impact on their organization’s level of Cyber Resilience

• Preparedness and agility are most important to improving levels of Cyber Resilience
o Sixty-five percent of respondents stated that their organizations have not devoted the necessary time and resources for planning and preparing for the next wave of cyberattacks
o More than half (55 percent) believe their organization lacks sufficient risk awareness, analysis, and assessments in combating those cyberattacks

“We found that Cyber Resilience is now the number one goal for security teams across these organizations, but they must adopt new technologies, improve collaboration across business functions, and have proper CSIRPs in place, among other things, before they can attain that goal,” said Ponemon. “Until then, their organizations remain extremely vulnerable to the next wave of cyberattacks from increasingly sophisticated and determined hackers.”

“We are honored to be partners with the Ponemon Institute, a prestigious independent research firm, on this critically important study. Cyber Resilience requires businesses to align prevention, detection, and response efforts – and it’s clear companies need help practicing and provisioning for their response to cyberattacks,” said John Bruce, CEO and Co-Founder of Resilient Systems. “By proactively ensuring their people, processes, and technologies are equipped for response, businesses can be confident that they’ll thrive despite growing cyber threats.”

ON DEMAND: Business-impacting events such as severe weather, man-made disasters, and supply chain disruption are increasing in frequency and making impacts around the globe.

In today's rapidly evolving security landscape, organizations face an ever-growing array of disruptive events, security threats and risks. Traditional reactive approaches to security intelligence often leave businesses vulnerable and ill-prepared to anticipate and mitigate emerging threats that could impact the safety of their people, facilities or operations.