Most official definitions of homeland security include terrorism prevention.  Many but not all encompass disaster response. Most do not include border security, or maritime security, or immigration matters, or general resilience, though some do.

“An absence of consensus about the inclusion of these policy areas may result in unintended consequences for national homeland security operations,” the report said. “For example, not including maritime security in the homeland security definition may result in policymakers, Congress, and stakeholders not adequately addressing maritime homeland security threats, or more specifically being able to prioritize federal investments in border versus intelligence activities.”

“The competing and varied definitions in these documents may indicate that there is no succinct homeland security concept. Without a succinct homeland security concept, policymakers and entities with homeland security responsibilities may not successfully coordinate or focus on the highest prioritized or most necessary activities.”

“At the national level, there does not appear to be an attempt to align definitions and missions among disparate federal entities,” CRS said.

Without a uniform definition, a coherent strategy cannot be formulated and homeland security policy is rudderless.  “Potentially, funding is driving priorities rather than priorities driving the funding.”

According to the report, there are 30 federal departments, agencies, and entities receiving annual homeland security funding excluding the Department of Homeland Security.  In fact, approximately 50% of homeland security funding is appropriated for agencies other than the Department of Homeland Security. (Secrecy News.com)