Security Magazine logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Security Magazine logo
  • NEWS
    • Security Newswire
    • Technologies & Solutions
  • MANAGEMENT
    • Leadership Management
    • Enterprise Services
    • Security Education & Training
    • Logical Security
    • Security & Business Resilience
    • Profiles in Excellence
  • PHYSICAL
    • Access Management
    • Fire & Life Safety
    • Identity Management
    • Physical Security
    • Video Surveillance
    • Case Studies (Physical)
  • CYBER
    • Cybersecurity News
    • More
  • BLOG
  • COLUMNS
    • Cyber Tactics
    • Leadership & Management
    • Security Talk
    • Career Intelligence
    • Leader to Leader
    • Cybersecurity Education & Training
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Annual Guarding Report
    • Most Influential People in Security
    • The Security Benchmark Report
    • The Security Leadership Issue
    • Top Guard and Security Officer Companies
    • Top Cybersecurity Leaders
    • Women in Security
  • SECTORS
    • Arenas / Stadiums / Leagues / Entertainment
    • Banking/Finance/Insurance
    • Construction, Real Estate, Property Management
    • Education: K-12
    • Education: University
    • Government: Federal, State and Local
    • Hospitality & Casinos
    • Hospitals & Medical Centers
    • Infrastructure:Electric,Gas & Water
    • Ports: Sea, Land, & Air
    • Retail/Restaurants/Convenience
    • Transportation/Logistics/Supply Chain/Distribution/ Warehousing
  • EVENTS
    • Industry Events
    • Webinars
    • Solutions by Sector
    • Security 500 Conference
  • MEDIA
    • Videos
      • Cybersecurity & Geopolitical Discussion
      • Ask Me Anything (AMA) Series
    • Podcasts
    • Polls
    • Photo Galleries
  • MORE
    • Call for Entries
    • Classifieds & Job Listings
    • Continuing Education
    • Newsletter
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Store
    • White Papers
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • This Month's Content
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!

Leveling Risk of Forced Entry

February 1, 2005
Protection of buildings from forced entry calls for more than a comic book hero. Future threats will come from people carrying and driving in explosives. Artwork of Zen, who hunts terrorists, from Zen Comics, Los Angeles, and Canadian publisher SSS Comics. Photo: PRNewsPhoto
It may seem that troubling reality is blurring with futuristic science fiction. For example, a comic book hero, Zen intergalactic mercenary, now fights terrorists who possess deadly new weaponry. Jump back to today and many government and corporate security executives now face attacks on their facilities never imagined just a few years ago. And they are fighting back with diverse tech weapons, too. There are three types of exterior terrorist concerns that relate to the selection of threat resistant window and wall systems: forced entry attacks, ballistic attacks and blast attacks

Forced entry attacks relate to burglaries and civil disturbance threats. HP White Specification 02: TP-05000.02, dated September 1993, indicates five levels of force entry protection against various types of attacks. These include blunt impact (hammers), sharp impact (chisels), thermal stress (torches) and chemical deterioration (solvents). The levels of protection relate to either the number of impacts a forced entry protected assembly will withstand or the time, in minutes, required to bypass a forced entry protected assembly with the use of torches or chemical agents. Level I offers the least amount of resistance protection; Level V offers the most amount of resistance protection.

Ballistic attacks relate to gunshot bullet threats. UL Laboratories: UL 752 Criteria, Table 3.1, dated Jan. 27, 1995, indicates eight levels of ballistic resistant protection. Level 1 ballistic protected assemblies is the least resistant, and will only withstand a single shot from small handguns. Level 3 ballistic protected assemblies will withstand multiple (four to five) shots from average handguns. Level 4 ballistic protected assemblies will withstand multiple (four to five) shots from high-powered hunting and sporting rifles, such as a .30-06, with a muzzle energy of 971 to 1,175 foot-pounds. Level 8 ballistic protected assemblies are the most resistant, and will withstand multiple shots from high-powered military assault rifles and machine guns. Ballistic attacks may also include punching type threats from shrapnel or high-powered projected metal fragments that may result from an explosion.

Blast attacks relate to explosive bomb threats. The Interagency Security Committee of the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) developed criteria for blast mitigation design for window systems, which includes performance conditions, or acceptable protection levels from the glass shrapnel fragmentation hazards with a bombing event, and building blast category, or building types and their applicable levels of protection, which also directly relates to the blast level.

These criteria indirectly reflect the velocity and (hence lethality) of glass fragments based on their distance from the window threat. The GSA information is part of a comprehensive security criteria provided in their GSA Security Criteria, dated Oct.8, 1997, which was further clarified with their GSA Facilities Standards For Public Service, or PBS100, dated March 2003. With regard to protection levels from glass fragmentation, GSA criteria indicates five levels of blast resistant performance conditions or acceptable maximum damage level.

Level 5 blast-protected assemblies provide low performance condition protection and are the least resistant, where window systems fail “catastrophically” and glass fragments enter space behind the window, impacting a vertical panel or wall at a distance of 10 feet from the window face.

Level 1 blast protected assemblies provide safe performance condition protection and are the most resistant; the glass panel does not break and no visible damage to the glass panel or frame occurs. Level 3 provides high performance condition protection and is divided into two sub-categories; Levels 3A and 3B. Level 3A designation allows glass to crack, with fragments or glass shards entering the enclosed space and landing on the floor no further than 3.3-feet from the window. Level 3B allows window glass to crack, with fragments or glass shards entering the protected space and landing on the floor no further than 10 feet from the window. Level 4 provides medium performance condition protection, and allows glass to fail and not be fully retained in the frame, with fragments landing on the floor more than 10 feet from the window.

Research continues on how facilities can secure against new-age forced entry attacks as well as natural disasters. Just months ago, FM Global of West Glocester, R.I., opened a new $78 million research campus to analyze devastating fires, explosions and electrical hazards. Photo courtesy of FM Global
It should be noted that GSA criteria does not address two significant concerns: the lethality of Level 4 performance for those persons sitting within ten feet of their windows, and the lethality of Level 3 performance in the absence of demonstrated proof that the quantity of shattered glass in the Level 3 area is limited to less that 500 grams of glass.

With regard to building types and their applicable levels of protection, GSA criteria indicate five categories of building types. Category Type A applies to unprotected buildings and is the lowest level of protection. Category Type C applies to federal courts and federal buildings, such as the Martin Building, and recommends a level of construction protection to withstand 4 psi maximum blast pressure and a 28 psi-ms maximum blast impulse. This blast corresponds to the threat from a TNT bomb (typically a car bomb), weighing 425 pounds and detonated at a distance of 180 feet from the face of the building. Obviously, smaller bombs situated closer can cause equal or greater damage. Category Type D applies to high-level military facilities, such as the Pentagon, and recommends a level of construction protection to withstand 10 psi maximum blast pressure and 89 psi-ms maximum blast impulse. This blast corresponds to the threat from a TNT bomb (typically a truck bomb), weighing 2500 pounds and detonated at a distance of 200 feet from the face of the building. Category Type E applies to the White House with protection levels that are classified.

Typical governmental facilities, including industrial facilities, are recommended to have at a minimum GSA building category of Type C, with peak pressure of 4 psi and blast impulse of 28 psi-ms for the SMUD facility. To square this inconsistency, it is advisable, where possible, to specify a blast mitigation window film and attachment system that has been tested to comply with the following:

1. The test section must show the recording of the amount of glass fragments, by weight, which entered the test cubicle in the case of GSA class 3A or 3B. For category 3B performance, the total glass fragment mass must be recorded in zones 3A and 3B.

2. The test section must show (for at least three tested specimens) the recording of no more than a medium mass level of glass fragmentation (less than 501 grams of glass particulate) in zones 3A and 3B.

3. The film attachment and/or restraint system must be tested to both pass and failure levels of blast overpressure. Critically, the tests must demonstrate that when the system fails, it does not detach from the window frame, thereby adding an additional hazard to the internal environment beyond that which is present from the glass and film.

If these requirements are not specified, there is a danger that the blast load will be transferred to the window frame and cause failure.

Any restraint system must be proven to reduce the dynamic load transferred to the window frame through elastic absorption or ductility.

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
To unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • Security's Top Cybersecurity Leaders 2024

    Security's Top Cybersecurity Leaders 2024

    Security magazine's Top Cybersecurity Leaders 2024 award...
    Top Cybersecurity Leaders
    By: Security Staff
  • cyber brain

    The intersection of cybersecurity and artificial intelligence

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is a valuable cybersecurity...
    Security Leadership and Management
    By: Pam Nigro
  • artificial intelligence AI graphic

    Assessing the pros and cons of AI for cybersecurity

    Artificial intelligence (AI) has significant implications...
    Logical Security
    By: Charles Denyer
Manage My Account
  • Security eNewsletter & Other eNews Alerts
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Online Registration
  • Mobile App
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Security audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Security or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Crisis Response Team
    Sponsored byEverbridge

    Automate or Fall Behind – Crisis Response at the Speed of Risk

  • Perimeter security
    Sponsored byAMAROK

    Why Property Security is the New Competitive Advantage

Popular Stories

Coding

AI Emerges as the Top Concern for Security Leaders

Half open laptop

“Luigi Was Right”: A Look at the Website Sharing Data on More Than 1,000 Executives

Shopping mall

Victoria’s Secret Security Incident Shuts Down Website

Laptop with coding on ground

Stepping Into the Light: Why CISOs Are Replacing Black-Box Security With Open-Source XDR

Gift cards and credit cards

Why Are Cyberattacks Targeting Retail? Experts Share Their Thoughts

2025 Security Benchmark banner

Events

June 24, 2025

Inside a Modern GSOC: How Anthropic Benchmarks Risk Detection Tools for Speed and Accuracy

For today's security teams, making informed decisions in the first moments of a crisis is critical.

July 17, 2025

Tech in the Jungle: Leveraging Surveillance, Access Control, and Technology in Unique Environments

From animal habitats to bustling crowds of visitors, a zoo is a one-of-a-kind environment for deploying modern security technologies.

View All Submit An Event

Products

Security Culture: A How-to Guide for Improving Security Culture and Dealing with People Risk in Your Organisation

Security Culture: A How-to Guide for Improving Security Culture and Dealing with People Risk in Your Organisation

See More Products

Related Articles

  • New Newswire Feature Image 3/8/2012

    Armed Man Attempts Forced Entry at Buckingham Palace

    See More
  • woman walks through entry security tool

    Leveling up: Top 3 trends for entrance security

    See More
  • From RSA: Information Security Professionals Say Cuts Leveling Off

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • 1119490936.jpg

    Solving Cyber Risk: Protecting Your Company and Society

  • Risk-Analysis.gif

    Risk Analysis and the Security Survey, 4th Edition

  • 9780367339456.jpg.jpg.jpg

    Cyber Strategy: Risk-Driven Security and Resiliency

See More Products
×

Sign-up to receive top management & result-driven techniques in the industry.

Join over 20,000+ industry leaders who receive our premium content.

SIGN UP TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing