Security Magazine logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Security Magazine logo
  • NEWS
    • Security Newswire
    • Technologies & Solutions
  • MANAGEMENT
    • Leadership Management
    • Enterprise Services
    • Security Education & Training
    • Logical Security
    • Security & Business Resilience
    • Profiles in Excellence
  • PHYSICAL
    • Access Management
    • Fire & Life Safety
    • Identity Management
    • Physical Security
    • Video Surveillance
    • Case Studies (Physical)
  • CYBER
    • Cybersecurity News
    • More
  • BLOG
  • COLUMNS
    • Cyber Tactics
    • Leadership & Management
    • Security Talk
    • Career Intelligence
    • Leader to Leader
    • Cybersecurity Education & Training
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Annual Guarding Report
    • Most Influential People in Security
    • The Security Benchmark Report
    • The Security Leadership Issue
    • Top Guard and Security Officer Companies
    • Top Cybersecurity Leaders
    • Women in Security
  • SECTORS
    • Arenas / Stadiums / Leagues / Entertainment
    • Banking/Finance/Insurance
    • Construction, Real Estate, Property Management
    • Education: K-12
    • Education: University
    • Government: Federal, State and Local
    • Hospitality & Casinos
    • Hospitals & Medical Centers
    • Infrastructure:Electric,Gas & Water
    • Ports: Sea, Land, & Air
    • Retail/Restaurants/Convenience
    • Transportation/Logistics/Supply Chain/Distribution/ Warehousing
  • EVENTS
    • Industry Events
    • Webinars
    • Solutions by Sector
    • Security 500 Conference
  • MEDIA
    • Videos
      • Cybersecurity & Geopolitical Discussion
      • Ask Me Anything (AMA) Series
    • Podcasts
    • Polls
    • Photo Galleries
  • MORE
    • Call for Entries
    • Classifieds & Job Listings
    • Continuing Education
    • Newsletter
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Store
    • White Papers
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • This Month's Content
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP!

Education & Training

The modern approach to employee screening, vetting and background checks

Detecting insider threats or employee misconduct begins with evaluating functional responsibility for vetting, along with the tools to aid in the process.

By Russ Law
education

bernie_photo / iStock / Getty Images Plus via Getty Images

russ law

Russ Law

education
russ law
June 17, 2022

Employee misconduct is a big problem that is too often ignored. Counterproductive work behavior costs U.S. companies $200 billion per year, and the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners estimates that fraud alone costs a company 5% of its revenue per year.

Bring this up in front of a CEO, Human Resources (HR) director or loss prevention executive, and they will certainly acknowledge the damage misconduct can do (i.e., to people, assets, reputation and culture), yet the company may continue to use the same broken process over again expecting better results when it comes to insider theft detection, loss prevention and employee screenings.

There are two main reasons for this:

  • The tools most frequently used to screen candidates for counterproductive work behavior are mostly based on a broken process.
  • The employee screening process is often owned by the HR department, which is not evaluated on metrics related to reducing counterproductive behavior.

Instituting a Proactive Employee Screening Process

When evaluating insider threats, employee misconduct, or even counterproductive work behaviors of employees, it’s essential for organizations to take a step back and evaluate the employee screening process. Screening candidates before the hiring process is an overlooked part of a solid insider threat program.

Let’s take a look at a few of the tools that can be used as a part of an employee screening process:

  • Criminal background checks: These checks are useful because they provide documented information about convictions. One weakness is the huge gap between what occurs and what is reported. Some companies, based on their own policies and procedures, may make a conditional offer of employment before performing a background check, which can waste an employer’s and candidate’s time. 
  • Reference checks: Reference checks are certainly a tool employers can use to sift through candidates, though online reference checking may provide a higher level of relevant information than a phone call method.. While fictional references may be difficult to detect or confirm, many background screening firms do have techniques in place to identify fraudulent references.
  • Interviews: Interviews can be quite useful for employers. For inexperienced or untrained interviewers, however, results may be inconsistent among a candidate pool. If executed properly though, interviews can be a particularly valuable path for organizations when it comes to screening.

Is the Vetting Process Owned by the Correct Team

In theory, it makes sense that the candidate screening process be owned by the Human Resources department as HR deals with all aspects of human capital within businesses.

So, what is wrong with HR managing the process for screening candidates for counterproductive behavior? HR screening processes are rarely, if ever, measured on metrics related to counterproductive work behavior. That responsibility is typically owned by the security or loss prevention department, which end up investigating cases of employee misconduct — but, of course, those investigations occur after an employee has been hired and the behavior warrants investigation.

Keep in mind this simple fact: every person in your company who is fired for criminal misconduct was hired using your screening process. There is no way around it.

With this in mind, I would make the case that it makes more sense for the security or loss prevention team to own the employee screening process, since their key performance indicators are directly related to detecting, preventing and investigating counterproductive work behavior.

Solutions to Boost Employee Screening Efficiency

Taking a look at organizational ownership over employee screening and vetting is an important consideration for all organizations. The next step is evaluating the processes and solutions being used for employee vetting and screening. In many cases, employers continue to use the same process for decades without reevaluation.

In a recent conversation with the head of talent assessment at a Fortune 100 telecommunications company, I was informed that they are stopping criminal background checks entirely for their retail stores. Their reason is that they analyzed the results of hiring candidates without a background check and found that there was no meaningful rise in theft. Therefore, the organization decided that they could save money by stopping the background checks and writing off the same amount of theft they had before. But, I would argue that this does not address the real problem.

There are a number of processes, technologies and procedures that organizations can implement during the hiring process and after to, not only mitigate theft, but also workplace violence and other potential insider threats. Organizations can implement targeted and specialized interview training for hiring managers to learn to conduct structured interviews that can arm an organization with intelligence it may not have garnered previously to help aid in hiring decisions. There are also technologies that can automate interviews to detect counterproductive work behaviors and gather information directly from the employee or potential employee.

In addition to traditional background checks before a candidate is hired, companies can implement technologies that continually check criminal databases after someone is hired, providing security leaders with a level of intelligence they may not have had previously.

Prevention Begins with Culture

While screening and continual vetting are important tools for organizations when it comes to preventing insider threats and misconduct, a proactive approach to risk mitigation begins with evaluating who owns the role, as well as evaluating the organization’s culture and understanding that culture can have a significant impact on preventing counterproductive behaviors in the future.


*Editor's note: This article has been edited since it was first published.

KEYWORDS: background check risk management screening security operations workplace violence

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Russ Law is CEO and Co-Founder of Verensics, a SaaS platform providing automated interviews that detect, prevent and investigate counterproductive work behavior. Law has 22 years of experience in corporate security, including 10 with ExxonMobil. He has a B.A. in journalism from Southern Methodist University and an M.S. in Criminology from Sam Houston State University. Image courtesy of Law

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
To unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • Security's Top Cybersecurity Leaders 2024

    Security's Top Cybersecurity Leaders 2024

    Security magazine's Top Cybersecurity Leaders 2024 award...
    Security Leadership and Management
    By: Security Staff
  • cyber brain

    The intersection of cybersecurity and artificial intelligence

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is a valuable cybersecurity...
    Security Enterprise Services
    By: Pam Nigro
  • artificial intelligence AI graphic

    Assessing the pros and cons of AI for cybersecurity

    Artificial intelligence (AI) has significant implications...
    New Security Technology
    By: Charles Denyer
Subscribe For Free!
  • Security eNewsletter & Other eNews Alerts
  • eMagazine Subscriptions
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Online Registration
  • Mobile App
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Security audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Security or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • Crisis Response Team
    Sponsored byEverbridge

    Automate or Fall Behind – Crisis Response at the Speed of Risk

  • Perimeter security
    Sponsored byAMAROK

    Why Property Security is the New Competitive Advantage

  • Duty of Care
    Sponsored byAMAROK

    Integrating Technology and Physical Security to Advance Duty of Care

Popular Stories

Red laptop

Cybersecurity leaders discuss Oracle’s second recent hack

Pills spilled

More than 20,000 sensitive medical records exposed

Coding on screen

Research reveals mass scanning and exploitation campaigns

Laptop in darkness

Verizon 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report shows rise in cyberattacks

Computer with binary code hovering nearby

Cyberattacks Targeting US Increased by 136%

2025 Security Benchmark banner

Events

May 22, 2025

Proactive Crisis Communication

Crisis doesn't wait for the right time - it strikes when least expected. Is your team prepared to communicate clearly and effectively when it matters most?

November 17, 2025

SECURITY 500 Conference

This event is designed to provide security executives, government officials and leaders of industry with vital information on how to elevate their programs while allowing attendees to share their strategies and solutions with other security industry executives.

View All Submit An Event

Products

Security Culture: A How-to Guide for Improving Security Culture and Dealing with People Risk in Your Organisation

Security Culture: A How-to Guide for Improving Security Culture and Dealing with People Risk in Your Organisation

See More Products

Related Articles

  • Exclusives Feature Image

    Infinity Screening: Why Background Checks Should Never End

    See More
  • empty lecture hall

    University of Arizona expands mandatory employee background checks

    See More
  • People waiting for interview

    Protecting Candidate Privacy During Background Checks

    See More
×

Sign-up to receive top management & result-driven techniques in the industry.

Join over 20,000+ industry leaders who receive our premium content.

SIGN UP TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • eNewsletter
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing