Home » Connecticut Supreme Court Rules Sandy Hook Families Can Sue Gun Manufacturer

Access ManagementEducation: K-12Fire & Life SafetyGovernment: Federal, State and LocalIdentity ManagementPhysical SecuritySecurity Newswire

Connecticut Supreme Court Rules Sandy Hook Families Can Sue Gun Manufacturer

March 23, 2019

No Comments

A Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled that gun maker Remington can be sued over how it marketed the Bushmaster rifle used to kill children and teachers at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012.

Justices issued a 4-3 decision that reinstated a wrongful-death lawsuit and overturned a lower-court ruling that the lawsuit was prohibited by a 2005 federal law that shields gun manufacturers from liability in most cases when their products are used in crimes.

The original lawsuit was filed by nine families of the victims in Sandy Hook and a teacher who was injured in the shooting. It names gun manufacturers and distributors Bushmaster, Remington, Camfour Holdings LLP, and Riverview Gun Sales Inc., the gun shop where the shooter's mother purchased the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle, and the store's owner.

The decision will allow the families to pursue one of their claims in the case: that Remington, the rifle manufacturer, knowingly marketed the gun to "carry out offensive, military style combat missions against their perceived enemies."

In their original complaint, the families outlined some of the marketing practices allegedly used by Bushmaster. "The Bushmaster Defendant's 2012 Bushmaster Product Catalog shows soldiers moving on patrol through the jungles, armed with Bushmaster rifles," the lawsuit reads. "Superimposed over the silhouette of a soldier holding his helmet against the backdrop of an American flag is text that reads 'when you need to perform under pressure, Bushmaster delivers.'"

Remington has denied wrongdoing, saying that it could not have known what the gun would be used for.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Conducting a Workplace Violence Threat Analysis and Developing a Response Plan

There are few situations a security professional will face that is more serious than a potential workplace violence threat. Every security professional knows and understands that all employers have a legal, ethical and moral duty to take reasonable steps to prevent and respond to threats of violence in their workplace.

From extreme weather to cyberattacks to workplace violence, every organization will experience at least one, if not multiple, critical events per year. And in today’s interconnected digital and physical world, the cascading safety, brand, and revenue impacts of critical events are more severe.

Poll

Emergency Communications

View Results

Poll Archive

Products

Effective Security Management, 6th Edition

Effective Security Management, 5e, teaches practicing security professionals how to build their careers by mastering the fundamentals of good management. Charles Sennewald brings a time-tested blend of common sense, wisdom, and humor to this bestselling introduction to workplace dynamics.

See More Products

Security Magazine

2019 December

This month, Security magazine brings you the 2019 Guarding Report, featuring David Komendat, Boeing CSO, and many other public safety leaders to discuss threats and solutions for 2020 and security officer training. Also, we highlight Hector Rodriguez, Director of Public Safety and Security at Marymount California University, CCPA regulations, NIST standards, VMS and much more.

View More Create Account

Connecticut Supreme Court Rules Sandy Hook Families Can Sue Gun Manufacturer

Related Articles

Report Abusive Comment