This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Security Magazine logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Security Magazine logo
  • Home
  • News
    • Security Newswire
    • Technologies
    • Security Blog
    • Newsletter
    • Web Exclusives
  • Columns
    • Career Intelligence
    • Security Talk
    • The Corner Office
    • Leadership & Management
    • Cyber Tactics
    • Overseas and Secure
    • The Risk Matrix
  • Management
    • Leadership Management
    • Enterprise Services
    • Security Education & Training
    • More
  • Physical
    • Access Management
    • Video Surveillance
    • Identity Management
    • More
  • Cyber
  • Sectors
    • Education: University
    • Hospitals & Medical Centers
    • Critical Infrastructure
    • More
  • Exclusives
    • Security 500 Report
    • Most Influential People in Security
    • Top Guard and Security Officer Companies
    • The Security Leadership Issue
    • Annual Innovations, Technology, & Services Report
  • Events
    • Industry Events
    • Webinars
    • Solutions by Sector
    • Security 500 Conference
    • Security 500 West
  • Resources
    • The Magazine
      • This Month's Issue
      • Digital Edition
      • Archives
      • Professional Security Canada
    • Videos
      • ISC West 2019
    • Photo Galleries
    • Polls
    • Classifieds & Job Listings
    • White Papers
    • Mobile App
    • Store
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Continuing Education
  • InfoCenters
    • Break-in Prevention
    • Building AppSec in Enterprises
    • Video Management Systems
  • Contact
    • Editorial Guidelines
  • Advertise
Home » Smartphone Bans are Taking a Toll on the Federal Workforce
Cyber Security NewsAccess ManagementCyberGovernment: Federal, State and LocalIdentity ManagementPhysical SecuritySecurity Newswire

Smartphone Bans are Taking a Toll on the Federal Workforce

smartphone1-900px.jpg
February 13, 2019
Mike Fong
KEYWORDS cybersecurity / Government Security / smartphone security / smartphones
Reprints
No Comments

As if changing missions, resource shortages and salary pressures weren’t big-enough challenges, many federal workers must deal with another hurdle that’s been largely overlooked: smartphone bans. Designed to keep remotely hijacked cameras and microphones outside of secure spaces and other work areas, smartphone bans leave many employees feeling hamstrung in their ability to do their jobs and isolated from colleagues, friends and family. As a result, productivity, morale and recruiting suffer, ultimately putting an agency’s mission effectiveness in jeopardy.

The side effects of these bans can be detrimental, but luckily, there are different avenues that federal agencies can take to empower their personnel to succeed.

The Birth of Smartphone Bans

The Snowden leaks revealed that as early as 2008, the National Security Agency (NSA) had planned a remote installation exploit for the iPhone that would activate the device’s cameras and microphones. It’s a safe bet that in 2019, the NSA and every intelligence agency on the planet have sophisticated smartphone surveillance tools at their disposal. Other than the occasional glimpse – like the claim tying the Dark Caracal spyware campaign to Lebanese intelligence – the public rarely gets a look at this world. The closest we get is watching modern spy thrillers on Netflix like Pine Gap and Secret City.

Against this backdrop, practices and procedures designed to keep these potential surveillance devices out of reach of the government’s most closely held secrets make sense. For years, the Pentagon has required phones – even government-issued ones – be left in storage containers outside of secure spaces, which are offices and meeting rooms where sensitive information is handled and discussed. This practice was first codified in November 2017 for all agencies dealing with classified information through a directive issued by the Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS), an interagency committee led by the Department of Defense (DoD), and again in May 2018 through a mobile device ban published by the Deputy Secretary of Defense.

The New Cigarette Break

At federal buildings like the Pentagon, workers either keep their mobile devices in their cars or surrender them in lock boxes, cubbies or cabinets outside of their workplaces. The smartphone break has replaced the cigarette break, with employees huddling in common areas like doorways and courtyards to get their digital fix. Whether that’s keeping tabs on a sick family member or scrolling through social media as a way of relieving stress, federal employees are as attached to their smartphones as the rest of humanity.

Back in the office, workers have to rely on their computers, landline phones and pen and paper to get their tasks accomplished. During meetings and while away from their desks, personnel miss out on a host of opportunities to work more efficiently – things like responding to an urgent email during a non-relevant portion of a presentation, shooting a quick text to a colleague to get their thoughts on a project, finding a document or coordinating future meeting schedules with other participants.

All of this adds up to a lot of wasted time. It’s no surprise that the average government worker loses 52 minutes of productivity time per day – and 28 percent in overall productivity – without a smartphone at work, according to a 2016 Frost & Sullivan survey. Do the math for every federal employee under a ban and you’re looking at staggering annual productivity losses.

It’s Personal, Not Just Professional

Perhaps the biggest downside to a smartphone ban from the worker’s perspective is the lack of contact with the people closest to them. Anybody who’s been on a plane without Wi-Fi or otherwise out of pocket for hours at a time knows the feeling of playing catch-up with their own life. And ten-minute bursts of smartphone use can only go so far when there’s a family emergency or other time-sensitive situation. In fact, the typical government worker loses 50 minutes of personal time each day just from not having a smartphone at work. And this has a huge effect on morale – a 2016 Economist Intelligence Unit survey shows a huge gap in employee satisfaction (23 percent ) between organizations who put mobile first and those who don’t.

Morale, of course, has a strong correlation with productivity. Contented employees tend to work harder and better, resulting in decreased absenteeism, fewer mistakes and a more positive work environment. In fact, highly engaged workers are a whopping 22 percent more productive than their less-engaged peers.

In an era marked by instability throughout the federal government – compounded by changing missions, budget cuts, unfilled vacancies in key positions, hiring freezes, labor-management battles, furloughs and government shutdowns – agencies are already fighting an uphill battle when it comes to morale. According to a 2018 Partnership for Public Service survey, the federal employee engagement score dropped slightly between 2017 and 2018. Compare the government engagement score of 62.2 percent to the private-sector score of 77.1 percent and it’s obvious that the federal government needs to do everything in its power to make morale a priority.

Not Getting Any Younger

You might be thinking, “What young person would want to work without a smartphone?” And you’d be right. These digital natives came of age with eyes glued to their smartphones, relying on these devices for communication, entertainment and personal efficiency. The numbers don’t lie: four out of ten millennials refuse to work for an organization that doesn’t allow personal devices in the workplace.

And that’s a big problem. The percentage of the federal workforce that’s eligible to retire is 14 percent, according to 2018 data provided the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), and that number is expected to balloon to 30 percent by 2023. As baby boomers leave the federal government in droves, millennials will be needed to replenish the talent pipeline. And yet, the percentage of full-time federal employees under age 30 has been in decline since 2011. At the end of fiscal year 2017, this cohort made up just 6 percent of the federal workforce (compared to 21 percent of the private-sector workforce).

As with morale, the deck is stacked against federal recruiting, particularly for those younger workers with the technical skills that federal agencies will need to innovate and deliver on their missions in the coming decades. In addition to realistic mobile policies, the private sector offers better pay, cooler perks, faster innovation and painless hiring processes. Removing just one of these barriers would make life easier for hiring managers.

Emerging Options

For security reasons, federal agencies dealing with classified information don’t trust software-based solutions to lock down their commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) smartphones. There are simply too many soft spots in the smartphone ecosystem, from bugs in the underlying operating system (OS) to security gaps in the supply chain to chip-level vulnerabilities. It’s virtually impossible to keep out sophisticated malware (like the kind developed by foreign intelligence services) with any degree of assurance, inviting the remote activation of cameras and microphones by threat actors.

Luckily, solutions centered around high-security, external mobile hardware are emerging that provide secure smartphone protections in isolation from the vulnerable device. It’s now possible to physically block a smartphone’s cameras and mask its surrounding audio while enforcing adherence to agency policies. In the future, solutions like these may become approved exceptions to federal policies banning smartphones. Through these solutions and more, the federal government will be able to unleash federal workers and give them the tools they need to best do their jobs. Only through bold thinking and fresh ideas will federal agencies be able to turn the tides on productivity, morale and recruiting.

 

Subscribe to Security Magazine

Recent Articles by Mike Fong

The Group Dynamics of Smartphone Eavesdropping

Mikefongbiopichori1

Mike Fong is Founder and CEO of Privoro.

Related Articles

Theft Takes a Toll on Retailers' Bottom-Line Profits

Could STEM Education Help Close the Skill Gap in the Federal Workforce?

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • Security eNewsletter & Other eNews Alerts
  • Online Registration
  • Mobile App
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Popular Stories

ransomware-enews

British American Tobacco Suffers Data Breach and Ransomware Attack

cybersecurity breach

The Top 12 Data Breaches of 2019

Dispelling the Dangerous Myth of Data Breach Fatigue; cyber security news

Major Retailer Macy's Is Hacked

server room, cybersecurity, penetration testing,

Explained: Firewalls, Vulnerability Scans and Penetration Tests

cyber network

How to Achieve Cybersecurity with Patience, Love and Bribery

SEC2019_Everbridge_1119_360x184customcontent

Events

December 17, 2019

Conducting a Workplace Violence Threat Analysis and Developing a Response Plan

There are few situations a security professional will face that is more serious than a potential workplace violence threat. Every security professional knows and understands that all employers have a legal, ethical and moral duty to take reasonable steps to prevent and respond to threats of violence in their workplace.
January 23, 2020

The Value of a Unified Approach to Critical Event Management

From extreme weather to cyberattacks to workplace violence, every organization will experience at least one, if not multiple, critical events per year. And in today’s interconnected digital and physical world, the cascading safety, brand, and revenue impacts of critical events are more severe.
View All Submit An Event

Poll

Emergency Communications

What does your enterprise use to communicate emergencies to company employees?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Effective Security Management, 6th Edition

Effective Security Management, 6th Edition

 Effective Security Management, 5e, teaches practicing security professionals how to build their careers by mastering the fundamentals of good management. Charles Sennewald brings a time-tested blend of common sense, wisdom, and humor to this bestselling introduction to workplace dynamics. 

See More Products
SEC500_250x180 clear

Security Magazine

SEC-December-2019-Cover_144px

2019 December

This month, Security magazine brings you the 2019 Guarding Report, featuring David Komendat, Boeing CSO, and many other public safety leaders to discuss threats and solutions for 2020 and security officer training. Also, we highlight Hector Rodriguez, Director of Public Safety and Security at Marymount California University, CCPA regulations, NIST standards, VMS and much more.

View More Create Account
  • More
    • Market Research
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • Security Group
    • Editorial Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
    • Survey And Sample
  • Want More
    • Subscribe
    • Connect
    • Partners

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing