Twitter, RSS and Facebook logos

  Connect with Security Magazine!
     Follow us on Twitter and Facebook or subscribe to our newsletters or RSS feeds.

Government: Federal, State & Local

Some FIPS Tips…

Since HSPD-12 was announced back in 2004, state and local government agencies as well major federal contractors have felt pressure to start incorporating FIPS-201 compliant cards and readers into their access control systems. Sometimes, these cards are called something else – for instance, they are referred to as CAC cards by the military. 

The FIPS 201 Personal Identity Verification (PIV) card standard requires contact and contactless smart card technologies and biometrics and provides specific standards for the issuance and use of the PIV card. It’s important for those wanting to be compliant that they do not use cards that are either only contactless or only contact. Both are needed on the cards.

However, there has been a major misunderstanding of what this requirement means. Although the technology standard is very specific about the card, it does not specify the physical access control system used at one’s facility. The strict biometric and card standards cover only the technologies used at credentialing or visitor centers where people get authenticated to become eligible to get the card. For these locales, what equipment to buy is very limited. Not so for everyone else. 

For use in physical access control at one’s facility, the only requirement is that the reader can indeed read the card. What you install for a reader is up to you; it just needs to be able to read either the contactless or contact portion of the card. In today’s world, of course, the very large majority of users select the contactless technology for their readers.

Although almost all federal employees have been issued their FIPS-201 cards, surprisingly, most are not using it for physical access control. That’s because, when the plan was initiated, the government was more concerned about logical access control. But, things are changing. Earlier this year, the director of the program issued a memorandum telling federal agencies to “aggressively step up their efforts” to use the FIPS-201 card as “the common means of authentication for access to that agency’s facilities….”

 

So Where’s the Budget?

Unfortunately, there was no cash sent along with the memorandum. Whether a large organization that does business with the government or a small federal bureau in the middle of Kansas, organizations have been unwilling to cast aside their present proximity card-based access control systems, which work just fine, for the new FIPS 201 smart card. They know that any retrogrades being done in the immediate future need to read their present proximity card, but does it makes sense to install proximity readers when, down the line, readers that read the FIPS 201 smart cards will be needed. As with so many upgrade programs, it’s pretty obvious that both proximity and the imminent FIPS 201 cards will need to overlap for a certain amount of time. What can you do if you are facing this dilemma?

The solution is actually quite simple and lets users have their cake and eat it too while keeping the budget and downtown to a minimum. Select multi-technology readers which are compatible with both FIPS 201 credentials and popular proximity and smart card technologies. They read your existing proximity card types and the new FIPS 201 cards simultaneously.

 

Caveat Emptor

Yes, the solution is easy but buyer, beware. Not all multi-technology readers will help. You need to not only verify that your proposed reader technology meets the FIPS 201 card interoperability standards but that the physical access system you are considering communicates with that reader. In other words, be sure that the multi-technology reader reads both 13.56 MHz smart cards as well as your present 125 KHz proximity cards. Be apprised: not all manufacturers’ readers read all manufacturers’ proximity cards. If you buy proximity cards from several manufacturers, be sure to check them all for readability. Likewise, does the reader cover all the popular smart card technologies? If your organization also uses a PIN, you will need a reader with a keypad as well. 

Installation will be easier if the readers can be installed as a complete system from the factory with specific FIPS 201 compliant components including the lock, panel interface and reader. Speaking of the lock, the government typically insists that it meets ANSI/BHMA Grade 1 requirements. And, can you get Wiegand communication to the access control panel?

With the right multi-credential readers, you can flexibly plan for the future using your present proximity cards today and migrating to the FIPS 201 smart cards when budgets and time allow.

Secsdm0911-welcome-inbody-150

Doug Otto is the Manager of Government Markets at Ingersoll Rand Security Technologies.

FIPS 201 and Physical Access

Sal D'Agostino
September 14, 2011 8:37 AM
Doug, As someone who is very closely involved in the use of PIV and PVI-I credentials (e.g. a certified smart card industrial professional, the author of guidance from 2005 by SIA on the use of cryptography in security system, Vice Chair of SIA's PIV Working Group, Secretary of the Smart Card Alliance Identity and Physical Access Councils and speaking next week at ASIS for the IT Security council on the topic among other qualification) I have to tell you that your article is wrong and dangerous. The guidance you are giving (or the statements you are making) " For use in physical access control at one’s facility, the only requirement is that the reader can indeed read the card. " is wrong! The whole difference here is that you just don't read the card and a number, if fact even present access control systems don't just do this. With a PIV card there are multiple authentication modes and even those that simply read the CHUID or cardholder identifier MUST evaluate a digital signature to confirm the integrity of the number and see if the issuer is trusted. Further in other (higher assurance) authentication methods the card must be challenged using either keys on the card and in some case this can require the use of asymmetric (public/private key cryptography and also leverage enterprise validation infrastructure. Maybe we should have a talk at ASIS so you fully understand the market you are addressing? Regarding the memorandum (by which I think you mean the Office of Management and Budget 11-11) it is not issued by the director of the program. The FIPS 201 program is housed at NIST, other aspects of this are the responsibility of GSA and other guidance comes from the CIO Council. As Manager of Government markets I don't understand how you can both misrepresent how the credential are use but also where the policy and drivers come from. Unfortunately you are not alone and I think this further points out the need for better guidance about PIV and PIV-I in general. Respectfully, Sal


Re: FIPS 201 and Physical Access

Doug Otto
September 15, 2011 4:00 PM
In the article, we say that one must use a FIPS 201 card: Although the technology standard is very specific about the card, it does not specify the physical access control system used at one’s facility. The strict biometric and card standards cover only the technologies used at credentialing or visitor centers where people get authenticated to become eligible to get the card. For these locales, what equipment to buy is very limited. Not so for everyone else. We could have been clearer on the fact that the biometric used at the facility could be any biometric, not the biometric specified for the credentials offices. We could have also said the user can select the brand of access control system desired. Specifically, regarding the card reader used, we wrote: For use in physical access control at one’s facility, the only requirement is that the reader can indeed read the card. We assumed that the readers of Security magazine would infer from the above that a FIPS 201 card would need a FIPS 201 reader. More clarity was provided when we wrote: You need to not only verify that your proposed reader technology meets the FIPS 201 card interoperability standards but that the physical access control system you are considering communicates with that reader. We recognize that there is more complexity in securing the communication between the card, reader and access control system, however the intent of this article was not to be overly technical. With the uniqueness of each application, buyers should consult with an experienced integrator or security consultant. For more detail, readers can access the “Recommendation for the Use of PIV Credentials in Physical Access Control Systems (PACS)” NIST SP800-116 at http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-116/SP800-116.pdf and “PIV Card to Reader Interoperability Guidelines” NIST SP800-96 at http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-96/SP800-96-091106.pdf. Lastly, we wrote: Earlier this year, the director of the program issued a memorandum telling federal agencies to “aggressively step up their efforts” to use the FIPS-201 card as “the common means of authentication for access to that agency’s facilities….” In regards to this, the readers will find the memorandum at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2011/m11-11.pdf. For brevity’s sake, we said “the director of the program.” We did not feel detailing the chains of command at the government were pertinent to the article. Jacob J. Lew is the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. We could have also said “the government.”


You must register or login in order to post comments.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

Stanley Customer Appreciation Event at ASIS 2011

Customers enjoyed the annual Stanley customer appreciation event during ASIS 2011 in Orlando.

Podcasts

The New Age of Video Surveillance
In this podcast, Bill Lawrence, director of Service Solutions and Platforms for ADT Security Services, explains the growing interest in video surveillance by both government agencies as well as businesses of every stripe. He discusses what any organization should consider before investing heavily in the technology. Lawrence is a 25-year veteran of both the information technology and physical security industries, with extensive experience in network video surveillance and physical security convergence.
More Podcasts

Your Time

On a daily basis, how much work time do you estimate that you spend addressing an emergency or crisis within your organization?
See Poll Results Poll Archive

THE SECURITY STORE

comptiahighriseproductphoto
CompTIA Security+ Certification Study Guide
CompTIA's Security+ certification is a globally-recognized, vendor neutral exam that has helped over 60,000 IT professionals reach further and higher in their careers. The current Security+ exam (SY0-201) focuses more on being able to deal with security issues rather than just identifying them.
More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Vertical Sector Focus: Critical Infrastructures

criticalhomepagethumbFrom terrorism to vandalism, it’s preparedness, response, training and partnerships. Learn about some of the critical security issues facing this sector.

Visit the Critical Infrastructure page to read more.  

STAY CONNECTED

facebooklogo twitterlogo  linkedinlogo  YouTube icon