- HOME
- THE MAGAZINE
- TOPICS
- VERTICAL SECTORS
- Critical Infrastructure
- Education: K-12
- Stadiums/Arenas/Large Public Venues
- Universities and College Campuses
- Supply Chain/Distributing and Warehousing
- Retail, Convenience Stores, Banks, Gas Stations
- Ports, Terminals and Transportation
- Property Management
- Finance & Banking
- Healthcare/Hospitals/Pharma/ Medical Centers
- Government: Federal, State & Local
- Casino Security
- COLUMNS
- BLOG
- RESOURCES
- MULTIMEDIA
- EVENTS
MoreWith law enforcement, private security and even consumers using Taser gear, a ruling this week in San Francisco sets standards of use and level of claims. Police need reasons to believe a suspect is dangerous before firing a Taser and cannot use their stun gun simply because the person is disobeying orders or acting erratically, a federal appeals court ruled Monday. The decision by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sets judicial standards for police and for people who claim they were victims of excessive force after police hit them with a Taser dart. Though stun guns may offer a valuable, nonlethal alternative to deadly force in defusing dangerous situations, the judge said, they inflict a “painful and frightening blow” and must be used only when substantial force is necessary and other options are unavailable.
If you use a Taser, what do you think about the ruling? Email zaludreport@bnpmedia.com or Tweet at http://twitter.com/securitymag
With access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,
From terrorism to vandalism, it’s preparedness, response, training and partnerships. Learn about some of the critical security issues facing this sector. 
