Identity Management

Closing the Intelligence Gap with Identity-Powered Security

Something has gone horribly wrong in the world of security.

While security investment has continued at a steady pace, so have devastating data breaches – and the future trends don’t look any better.  Yet, perplexingly, we continue to behave as though simply spending more money and devoting more resources to what has failed in the past will yield a different result in the future.

In no other part of the business would such an approach be acceptable or tolerated.

The challenge is that for the security industry, any advances in keeping data safe are almost immediately offset by equivalent advances in the skills and tools of the attackers.  Worse, the very ground on which security is built – the infrastructure of business computing – is undergoing convulsive change, driven by cloud, mobility and social media.   Even treading water has become an all but unattainable goal.

So how does the security industry move past the spiral of chasing after new magic cure-alls while watching success drift even further away?  The answer is to broaden the use of information sources to better inform the security processes we already have.

The most basic question that any security team must answer revolves around the concept of what is “normal.” Is the behavior of this system, this service, or this person “normal” and “safe?”  Or is what we are seeing an indication of suspicious or malicious behavior?  The ability to answer this question, with what is termed “security intelligence,” is fundamental to understanding whether your organization is under attack. So much that it would be easy to imagine the capability to answer it is commonplace.  It isn’t.

Instead, organizations often struggle to understand who people really are, let alone whether they are behaving in a way that might suggest they were an insider with intent to damage, or perhaps that an outsider has compromised a privileged account.

This identity challenge – understanding who a user is, what is normal for them, what access they need, and what is business-appropriate for them fuels the security intelligence gap we continue to fail to close.

Another contributing factor to our intelligence gap is lack of monitoring and management of privileged users who have overly broad access rights to systems and data. As a result, organizations continue to experience avoidable data breaches, compliance failures and unnecessary risk.  Worse, when a privileged account is compromised and used as a vector for an attack – or that privileged user decides to behave maliciously – it’s often difficult to determine what they are doing and why.

Organizations must integrate “identity” into their security practices so that users with inappropriate access rights can be identified, monitored and managed to avoid unnecessary risk from internal and external attackers.   

Far too often, identity is relegated to operational tasks like provisioning access to business tools. Yet your “identity” carries invaluable information that could enrich and inform security teams who need to understand whether your access to a sensitive database is part of your job, or part of a plan to steal from your employer.

As more and more of the computing environment moves out of the control of the corporate IT function – out into the cloud or onto mobile devices – so too has the need to integrate a deep understanding of who the user really is, and what is normal for them becomes a foundational part of effective security monitoring.

Integrating identity into security monitoring will empower security teams to cut through the noise of activity and quickly identify if what they are seeing is normal and acceptable, or unusual and damaging. For example, when an employee exhibits unusual behavior, such as accessing a sensitive data store from a remote location on a mobile device rather than the usual method from the office, security teams can appropriately respond.

2014 needs to be the year security teams begin to embrace the notion that deeper identity context is required to improve security and incident response. This is the year for “identity-powered” security that provides the deeper identity context through integration with security monitoring to meet the demands of our complex and changing security landscape, closing the intelligence gap.

Without such identity-powered security, the fact is that we are going to see security teams continue to struggle to understand what behavior they are seeing, and most importantly, what the events they are monitoring really mean – and that is ultimately a recipe for continued failure, and more and more damaging data breaches.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Security Magazine. 

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

ASIS 2013 Product Preview

ASIS International 59th Annual Seminar and Exhibits, September 24-27 in Chicago, Illinois, will include an exhibit hall packed with innovative security solutions. Here are some of the products that will be shown at ASIS this year.

Podcasts

Virtualization and Data Center Security: What You Need to Know for 2014

Data centers are increasingly becoming the center of the enterprise, and data center and cyber security is following the same path for security departments. According to Justin Flynn, a consultant at the Burwood Group, the virtualization of data centers allows enterprises to scale more easily and faster, with a smaller footprint.

However, hosting enterprise data in the cloud can make intrusion detection more difficult – how can enterprise security leaders team up with other departments to keep aware of cyber risks and traffic, and physical and data compliance during the virtual transition? How can CISOs and CSOs discuss cyber threats with the C-Suite to get the resources they need? And how can the proper infrastructure test and verify possible malicious attacks? 

More Podcasts

Security Magazine

September 2014

2014 September

In the September issue of Security Magazine, find out who this year's most influential people are in the security industry are. Also, take a peek at the technology products that ASIS 2014 will be showcasing at the upcoming event. Read about the lessons learned from security at the World Cup, find out why tactical medical training is a must for your enterprise and how Atlanta increased security by sharing surveillance.
Table Of Contents Subscribe

Adopting New Technology

How long do you wait before adopting a new technology?
View Results Poll Archive

THE SECURITY STORE

comptiahighriseproductphoto
CompTIA Security+ Certification Study Guide
CompTIA's Security+ certification is a globally-recognized, vendor neutral exam that has helped over 60,000 IT professionals reach further and higher in their careers. The current Security+ exam (SY0-201) focuses more on being able to deal with security issues rather than just identifying them.
More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Vertical Sector Focus: Critical Infrastructures

criticalhomepagethumbFrom terrorism to vandalism, it’s preparedness, response, training and partnerships. Learn about some of the critical security issues facing this sector.

Visit the Critical Infrastructure page to read more.  

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook 40px 2-12-13 Twitter logo 40px 2-12-13  YouTube  LinkedIn logo 40px 2-12-13Google+