CSO Primer to Video Design, Installation, ROI
by Bill Zalud
March 1, 2008
 |
|
ROI with PoE.
This network camera from AXIS, with megapixel resolution, supports Power over
Ethernet, reducing installation costs by powering the camera over the network.
|
|
No
doubt, the largest enterprises – many already with an investment in security
video – view design, installation and updating of the systems as a more complex
effort. Then throw in return on investment needs from top management and things
can get really dicey.
Such projects demand closer work among the chief security
officer, his or her IT folks and a systems integrator with more muscle, brains
and experience than some smaller integrators.
Ken Amos of Walgreens knows the challenges. He is moving to
digital video recorders at the stores that handle more cameras and more
functionality for security, data collection and business needs. “Walgreens has
a corporate IT system for managing projects. It helps to organize complex
issues and also helps with electronic approvals and reminds people to keep on
track,” commented Amos.
“Since 2002 I have been in charge of our Loss Prevention
Department – consisting of over 300 supervisors, investigators and analysts,
working in every market to protect the safety of all our employees and the
profit of the company,” he added.
Amos matches his past experiences and future needs with other
enterprise security operations.
Cable and fiber remain a strong means of communicating images
and controls but there are new twists and tricks including unshielded twisted
pair wiring, IP networks, wireless mesh and what is emerging as “at the edge”
designs. All these new approaches, if designed right to meet the specifics of
your installation, can produce a solid ROI with install cost savings, use of an
enterprise’s existing infrastructure, more mobility for security staff to
receive and act on image alarms as well as easier integration with other
security, building and management systems.
Other security operations instead see value in establishing a
dedicated security video network, which will increase cost. Let’s look first
with working through the enterprise data network.
WORK WITH IT AND A KNOWLEDGEABLE INTEGRATOR
There’s something to say for smooth growth of installation
changes in the future.
As video surveillance systems increasingly connect to TCP/IP
networks, issues arise that call for practical and innovative applications and
deployments of devices. So explored are some real-world issues you should have
a handle on when working with your systems integrator and in-house IT.
If the design is to connect IP cameras, encoders or decoders
to your existing enterprise network, it’s more than a good idea to work with
your team to perform a careful survey of the telecommunication closets (also
called intermediate cross connects) where the IP-enabled security devices will
be connected to existing network switches.
There, for example, may not be enough RJ-45 ports on the
switch. No need for anyone to panic. Buy a new switch. But the downside is
expense so, by working with IT, you and your integrator may discover that IT
has been looking to upgrade its network’s switches. A more cost-effective
solution than obtaining a new switch is a multiple-input encoder.
If the integrator suggests using an unmanaged switch, think
twice. That would send a shiver down IT’s spine. A better fix would be to
relocate some encoders.
These design and installation solutions show one big
advantage of IP networking is the flexibility of network connections.
POE AND IP CAMERAS
 |
|
ROI on storage.
New hard drives such as this one from Seagate are designed to optimize
performance, save power and improve reliability in digital video surveillance
systems.
|
|
PoE, or Power over Ethernet, is an IEEE standardized
technology that provides 48 volts @ 350 milliamps DC current over the same two
UTP pairs as are used to transmit and receive 10/100 Ethernet. In a typical
scenario, a universal power system (UPS) should connect to a PoE-enabled
switch, which provides short-term power to the connected devices in the event
of power failure. PoE has become quite popular for powering VoIP telephone
instruments.
There are several ROI advantages for your security operation
when using PoE-enabled IP cameras in your installation. Separate wiring of the
camera’s power is eliminated, along with trying to find unswitched AC outlets
for plugging in transformers or power supplies. If the UPS connected to the PoE
is of sufficient capability, the security camera can remain functional for some
period of time after the start of a power failure.
Remember, however, than if your integrator recommends the
idea of replacing the existing switch with a new PoE-equipped network switch,
this may not be attractive to your IT department. An alternative is for the
security integrator to provide a separate mid-span PoE hub sized to provide
powered Ethernet connections just for the number of cameras to be connected in
that telecommunications closet.
PoE is a powerful tool, reducing costs while increasing the
viability of the security video system during power outages.
Transition was the
overarching theme at a recent technical forum -- IP-in-Action LIVE – put on by
the IP UserGroup USA. Hot talk centered on megapixel camera technology and
access control over the Internet as well as video analytics and storage. Behind
it all was the transition to IP cameras from legacy gear and the emerging
concept of camera “at the edge,” where the camera itself carries more local
storage and intelligence.
Such new age gear is
coming down in price and can provide chief security officers with better ROI
and a friendlier smile from IT.
Nearly 100 participants
heard Dan Dunkel, president of New Era Associates and columnist for Security
Magazine’s Today’s Systems Integrator. “Look to Wall Street, follow the money,
watch your kids and Internet research labs, go to an Apple store, watch the
commercials from Cisco,” Dunkel urged. “They will show you how things are going
to be. You have to ask yourself are you ready for a future that is already
here?”
CSOs joined a group including system integrators,
manufacturers, consultants and IP professionals at the event. Enterprise
sources ranged from the security systems design manager for Wal-Mart and security
systems administrator for cosmetic company Mary Kay, among others.
IP VIDEO: WHAT ABOUT A SEPARATE DEDICATED NETWORK?
The success of IP video
surveillance systems is dependent on many factors. In almost all cases at the
larger enterprises, network applications fall under the domain of IT. Data in
the form of access control, reports, and alarm notifications present little or
no problem. Video is another matter completely as it is bandwidth intensive
which can bring even the most robust data networks to their knees during peak
operation.
Contends experts such as
Neil Heller at American Fibertek, the simple truth is that the greater the
compression, the more a picture degrades. And unlike analog video systems, IP
recording and viewing are separate functions defined as video in and video out.
So the requirements for viewing and recording require their own bandwidth
allocation. If working on a shared video and data network, you must account for
all networked activities to assure you can maintain specified performance
parameters during peak usage.
SHARED NET MIGHT NOT WORK
 |
|
Transformation
and convergence were the themes at the recent IP UserGroup USA, keynoted by Dan
Dunkel. He told attendees to seek out information on emerging trends from
nontraditional sources, too.
|
|
Heller contended that employing a shared network simply may
not be feasible. As a result, many mid to large scale IP video surveillance
systems may require dedicated networks which add to both installation and
material costs. That may give a hit to the CSO’s budget and ROI.
There are numerous factors to evaluate when setting up an IP
surveillance network. You will need to consider the server and client
computers. Video programs are memory intensive and larger systems will easily
consume over 2 Gbytes of internal memory – and any computer/server speed less
than 800 MHz will present problems. Your graphics card is another
consideration. Is it compatible with the IP video management system and your
operating systems and do you have the right drivers?
Finally there is the issue of the computer’s operating
system. It is rare to find a computer today that doesn’t have Windows Vista
pre-installed. Many users installing Vista have been surprised to learn that
many of their system components no longer interface with their computer. So
make certain that your video management system is compatible with Vista and the
system components it needs to operate. Finally you need to decide how to get
camera images to the main recording point. Keep in mind basic Ethernet
connections can only travel 100 meters or about 330 feet.
The good news, according to Heller, is that once a network is
established, it can be expanded with great efficiency. Each component in the
system can be set up, operated and monitored independently. Multicasting provides the ability for
security devices to be monitored in multiple locations. Compression levels can
be changed to match system limitations. Standardized communication protocols
such as SNMP (Simple Network Mail Protocol) allow for interaction throughout
the network and via the Internet. Access can be achieved from any point on the
network allowing any networked computer to be used as a viewing monitor and
operation center. Standardization of databases and protocols also allows
interfacing with other security components such as access control and alarm
systems. This could never be
accomplished with analog video components and coax cable.
About the Sources
Security Magazine thanks SDM Magazine and its technical
writers, the IP UserGroup USA, Today’s System Integrator writer Dan Dunkel and
Neil Heller, director of new business development at American Fibertek.
SIDEBAR: Overcoming the Challenges
Here are some views from Neil Heller of American Fibertek:
- First, he believed, IP video systems should be on
their own network segregated from data networks.
- Second, don’t overload the network transmission
system as you will compromise performance and image quality.
- Third, Ethernet cable runs can be extended by using
Ethernet to fiber converters.
- Fourth, don’t overstress your servers by creating
location nodes that can be viewed individually where each node has its own
server within its own network. And to assure the highest levels of efficiency,
you should deploy an IP video management software solution that allows you to
view multiple servers as a single seamless system.
SIDEBAR: At the Edge
Placing
more intelligence and storage into digital cameras “at the edge” means that the
cameras reach conclusions and stream less data less often, based on analytics.
That design may provide more viable to IT. But there is added expense in
bringing in these new cameras.
|