Access Management

Workplace Violence Prevention Revisited

June 6, 2011
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+

In July 2010 I wrote about workplace violence within the healthcare industry in this column. The main focus was a document that was published by The Joint Commission titled, “Preventing violence in the health care setting.” I also discussed OSHA document 3148, “Guide for Preventing Workplace Violence for Healthcare Workers and Social Service Workers.” Both documents serve as a guide in the implementation of a workplace violence reduction program. In the column I stressed the need to install physical barriers in order to control access within specific areas of the facility. In addition, I emphasized the need to control visitors into the facility through the use of a visitor management system.

When it comes to workplace violence, the healthcare industry is not alone. OHSA has fined many organizations for violent incidents under its general duty clause and has been tracking violence within the workplace since the early 1990s.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, from 2004 through 2008, an average of 564 work-related homicides occurred each year in the U.S. In 2008, 526 workplace homicides were documented, accounting for 10 percent of all fatal work injuries.

OHSA document 3148 identifies key components in the reduction of workplace violence within healthcare facilities and to healthcare workers. The main component of this document is a checklist of questions that help in the identification of processes that can successfully reduce workplace violence. These controls look to restrict access to people and places within the organization through physical barrier installation and policy implementation. According to OHSA, physical access restriction is the key component to the elimination of violence within the workplace.

Beyond healthcare, physical access restriction holds true for any industry wishing to reduce workplace violence. The use of physical barriers is fundamental in this process. This access restriction starts at the perimeter of the property line. When putting together a workplace violence reduction program, it is important to funnel persons into specific entry points and secure the remainder of the perimeter. Security provisions should physically restrict access onto the property. Consideration should be given to the installation of fencing, walls and other physical barriers that will restrict access. 

At building exteriors, security systems should ensure that all exit and entry points are secure and have significant security in place to identify, detect and record any person who uses an access point in an unauthorized manner. Properly locking exit doors and installed alarm contacts and security video are keys in identifying the unauthorized use of fire exits and doors designated as closed to normal traffic. 

So the purpose of this column is not only to highlight the continued escalation of workplace violence, but promote the importance of providing a consistent perimeter access security program that can reduce violence in the workplace. However, the installation of barriers is not enough: Many times after barriers are installed there is little or no monitoring and maintenance of these provisions. Often I personally see and hear horror stories of poorly managed perimeter security equipment and systems, including:

•  Holes made in fencing or fencing compromised by fallen trees.

•  Vegetation allowed to grow over and around fencing.

•  Gates left hanging from their frames and gate locks are installed so that they can be opened by reaching around or through the fence.

•  The planting of high, thick scrubs that mask access points and allow assailants to hide undetected.

•  Lighting timers that are not updated to keep pace with seasonal changes or lighting that does not properly augment installed security video cameras.

The lack of repair and consistently inspecting exit and entry doors, fencing, lighting and exterior barricades undermines the fabric of any security program. The ability for an individual, stranger or ex-employee to identity and exploit these flaws in the security program may be the difference between a violent incident and the apprehension of an ex-employee/robber who should not be allowed in the facility.

When a commitment is made to identify and install systems to reduce the potential for violence, theft and trespass, processes must be put in place, along with the physical barricades and monitoring systems that will ensure the continued performance of these systems. Continued patrols, quick response to broken components and continued surveillance will guarantee the consistent level of security that is necessary to properly protect everyone that uses and resides within a facility.    

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Security Magazine. 

Recent Articles by Bernard Scaglione

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

ASIS 2013 Product Preview

ASIS International 59th Annual Seminar and Exhibits, September 24-27 in Chicago, Illinois, will include an exhibit hall packed with innovative security solutions. Here are some of the products that will be shown at ASIS this year.

Podcasts

Virtualization and Data Center Security: What You Need to Know for 2014

Data centers are increasingly becoming the center of the enterprise, and data center and cyber security is following the same path for security departments. According to Justin Flynn, a consultant at the Burwood Group, the virtualization of data centers allows enterprises to scale more easily and faster, with a smaller footprint.

However, hosting enterprise data in the cloud can make intrusion detection more difficult – how can enterprise security leaders team up with other departments to keep aware of cyber risks and traffic, and physical and data compliance during the virtual transition? How can CISOs and CSOs discuss cyber threats with the C-Suite to get the resources they need? And how can the proper infrastructure test and verify possible malicious attacks? 

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Security Magazine

April 2014

2014 April

In the April issue of Security magazine, read about integration partnerships and their growing success. The Boston Marathon bombing has changed the way integrators look at security for sporting events, see where they are one year after the tragic incident. Read about the 2014 RSA conference and this year's theme of "Threat Intelligence. Also, read about the latest products and news in the security industry.

Table Of Contents Subscribe

Background Checks

Who conducts background checks on new employees and contractors in your enterprise?
View Results Poll Archive

THE SECURITY STORE

comptiahighriseproductphoto
CompTIA Security+ Certification Study Guide
CompTIA's Security+ certification is a globally-recognized, vendor neutral exam that has helped over 60,000 IT professionals reach further and higher in their careers. The current Security+ exam (SY0-201) focuses more on being able to deal with security issues rather than just identifying them.
More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Vertical Sector Focus: Critical Infrastructures

criticalhomepagethumbFrom terrorism to vandalism, it’s preparedness, response, training and partnerships. Learn about some of the critical security issues facing this sector.

Visit the Critical Infrastructure page to read more.  

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook 40px 2-12-13 Twitter logo 40px 2-12-13  YouTube  LinkedIn logo 40px 2-12-13