Saving Your Company from a Data Breach Nightmare
by Mike Paquette
May 1, 2008
 |
|
Efforts to reduce
the risk of data breach must focus on reducing the likelihood of the event from
occurring, according to Mike Paquette.
|
|
High
profile data breaches such as the early 2007 TJX incident and the more recent
case of fraud at the Société Générale have quickly raised the awareness of the
problem. The data breach has now become a significant risk factor within many
organizations’ risk profiles. From corporate risk officers to IT
administrators, reducing the likelihood of an accidental or malicious breach of
customer or company data have quickly moved up the list of priorities. While
increased awareness of the risk is a positive step, actually reducing the risk
is proving to be a significant organizational and technological challenge.
In many risk analyses, risk factors are measured by the product
of the likelihood of an event happening and the impact of that event’s
occurrence. Although a data breach is no longer an automatic death sentence for
a corporation, it’s generally accepted that the remediation costs, fines and
negative publicity of a disclosed data breach constitute a major negative
impact to the mission of the organization. Efforts to reduce this risk must
therefore focus on reducing the likelihood of a data breach from occurring at
all.
The seemingly logical approach of “locking down” access to
confidential data flies in the face of today’s Web 2.0 trends, where our
dependency on the Internet and IT in general continues to increase. How can
organizations reduce the risk of a data breach while enabling the commerce,
collaboration and interactions that actually drive their mission?
It turns out that there is no simple formula that yields
significantly reduced risk of a data breach. Instead, as with many risk
factors, it takes the application of education, policies and technology to reduce
this risk.
It is important to realize that the threat of a data
breach comes from so-called cyber-criminals as well as from trusted employees
and third parties. In a May 2007 study, the Ponemon Institute found that while
vast majority of data breaches occurred due to missing devices, IT mishaps or
negligence, a significant 12 percent of reported data breaches were attributed
to criminal activity or malicious employees.
Give or Take?
One way to view the risk
of a data breach considers the “give” and “take” causes of data breaches. The
“give” category comprises data leakage incidents caused by the accidental or
negligent actions of a person trusted with access to the data. Disclosure of
confidential company news, R&D plans, trade secrets, intellectual property
and employee information all fall into this category. These incidents occur
when individuals leave documents in a public place, mistype an e-mail address
or forget a laptop on an airplane.
The “take” category includes incidents where data, or
the media on which the data is stored, is stolen or otherwise misappropriated.
This category includes laptop theft, phishing and a wide variety of malware
initiated incidents where information is stolen from computers as a result of
becoming infected with malware.
A Give and Take Plan for Data Protection
Organizations should consider both the give and take when
creating a data breach risk reduction plan. On the surface, the solution is
quite simple – make it harder for trusted people to “give” away data and make
it harder for those with malicious intentions to “take” it. Oh, and try to
achieve these goals without negatively impacting the mission goals of the
organization.
User education, creating and enforcing physical
security, data protection policies, and effective deployment of technology can
all play a part in reducing the likelihood of data breaches, but there are
different applications of these three elements required to protect against the
give and the take.
Protecting Against the Give Data Breach
Stated in its simplest form, don’t let trusted individuals
give away data, or at least make the data unusable when they do! Educate organizational members on how to
label and treat confidential information. Inform users that external e-mail
should not be assumed to be private, and must not contain sensitive company or
customer information.
Create policies that restrict the location and mandate the
control of physical media that contains the information. For example, reduce
the risk of laptop theft with a policy that provides every laptop user with
physical security devices for home, office, car and hotel. Make it a policy
that the laptop is not to be left unsecured anywhere.
Use technology such as hard-disk encryption to ensure
that even if/when computers or media are lost, the data is likely to remain
uncompromised. Also, consider the use of data leakage detection tools that
monitor information that is sent out of the organizations network, looking for
sensitive or confidential information.
Protecting Against the Take Data Breach
Again in its simplest form, don’t let malicious employees or
cyber criminals steal data from your organization.
Educate organizational members on how to defeat social
engineering attempts. Re-educate IT users not to execute files attached to
received e-mails, and make it clear to users “Don’t Click That Link!”
Tempt-to-click e-mails and instant messages are likely to remain a primary
method for infecting computers with malware, which can lead to stolen company
and personal information.
Create policies that govern use of laptop computers in public
Wi-Fi zones, perhaps by mandating VPN usage for all Internet access from these
environments. Ensure that all users with smart-phone access to the
organization’s e-mail system are using passwords on the mobile device. Enforce
a policy regarding use of public computers to access company e-mail.
Use technology to reduce the risk of compromised computers
that can lead to a data breach. Deploy endpoint security software, manage
desktops, keep software (not just operating systems) patched. Install Network
Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) technology, which is very effective in
reducing the likelihood of protected computers being compromised. Consider some
type of Network Admission Control (NAC) to keep compromised computers off the
organizational network. Network IPS, NAC and data leakage solutions complement
each other to create comprehensive information protection architecture.
The rapid growth of the data breach highlights a current imbalance
in the equation that plays off user convenience against data protection. It’s
time for a little give and take to restore balance to our IT-dependent world.
|